From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Glenn Morris Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: bug spam Date: Tue, 19 Jan 2010 14:15:04 -0500 Message-ID: References: <87iqb5o7ie.fsf@red-bean.com> <878wc1h524.fsf@stupidchicken.com> <874omph4f0.fsf@stupidchicken.com> <87pr5dmqfw.fsf@red-bean.com> <877hrl1m5m.fsf@telefonica.net> <86hbqpctyh.fsf_-_@fencepost.gnu.org> <19279.20828.784450.411540@fencepost.gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1263929828 17286 80.91.229.12 (19 Jan 2010 19:37:08 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 19 Jan 2010 19:37:08 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Chong Yidong Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Jan 19 20:37:01 2010 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1NXJsn-0007gT-Md for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 19 Jan 2010 20:36:58 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:53838 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1NXJso-0007Ts-Bv for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 19 Jan 2010 14:36:58 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1NXJXj-0002Yj-2U for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 19 Jan 2010 14:15:11 -0500 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1NXJXe-0002Xb-5j for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 19 Jan 2010 14:15:10 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=39133 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1NXJXd-0002XP-Vr for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 19 Jan 2010 14:15:06 -0500 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([140.186.70.10]:57293) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1NXJXd-0007IQ-I0 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 19 Jan 2010 14:15:05 -0500 Original-Received: from rgm by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1NXJXc-0007TC-Q6; Tue, 19 Jan 2010 14:15:04 -0500 X-Spook: Serbian Craig Livingstone Ft. Knox lock picking SHA ICE X-Ran: 7$O.ESb-45dx)+lENoR-|`ow_7}t=o$/_Pz+>XX3]]ZdS#j)1]7%Sc.EAHUsa`*wCF?/(~ X-Hue: white X-Attribution: GM In-Reply-To: (Glenn Morris's message of "Thu, 14 Jan 2010 22:59:54 -0500") User-Agent: Gnus (www.gnus.org), GNU Emacs (www.gnu.org/software/emacs/) X-detected-operating-system: by monty-python.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:120241 Archived-At: Glenn Morris wrote: > Of 2160 moderation messages in the past week: > > 1951 were for mails sent to emacsbugs addresses (90%) > 466 were for mails sent to done|close@emacsbugs (22%) > > But it's probably a bad idea to think this way. Somebody seems to have added a mailman auto-discard rule for ^[0-9]+.*@emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com I wondered why there were suddenly so few moderation requests...