From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Lennart Borgman Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Add function to make frame topmost? Date: Sat, 1 May 2010 00:13:30 +0200 Message-ID: References: NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1272665642 22839 80.91.229.12 (30 Apr 2010 22:14:02 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 30 Apr 2010 22:14:02 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Stefan Monnier , Emacs-Devel devel To: =?UTF-8?Q?Jan_Dj=C3=A4rv?= Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat May 01 00:14:01 2010 connect(): No such file or directory Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1O7yTA-0003kM-RM for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 01 May 2010 00:14:01 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:60129 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1O7yT9-0000Kb-S2 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 30 Apr 2010 18:13:59 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1O7yT4-0000Iw-Qa for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 30 Apr 2010 18:13:54 -0400 Original-Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=56840 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1O7yT3-0000HS-Ba for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 30 Apr 2010 18:13:54 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1O7yT1-0005Kx-J7 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 30 Apr 2010 18:13:53 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-fx0-f41.google.com ([209.85.161.41]:53857) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1O7yT1-0005Kr-Cx for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 30 Apr 2010 18:13:51 -0400 Original-Received: by fxm1 with SMTP id 1so641397fxm.0 for ; Fri, 30 Apr 2010 15:13:50 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:mime-version:received:in-reply-to :references:from:date:message-id:subject:to:cc:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=zLOj9jQh5U7xXTJJfHMCDfdx+vS7PA/boVYmbMOHfZ4=; b=Tu6rxrtejD1e3j1NuNQtIP51yXwJl6q2r07wsc96FqbhGN/wEbh86KWxYa/Sb4UBoG 4VN744bQ1SvhApC4iXm5o7ET/7ZEH828vIukw2Qf2P/DddfCdkLzdSRltOe0ncWaZ1tI QfosDIyLDSJp7JQ0JGSAdT4Hd8nJl+h8ov0nI= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=V0mCFM5j6B4j3V1J/UFUxIDei/nr5xVYDoxfnKaMlBuwraAWNu5hzGiYS0t9P+HAbb Aa6bDYMKJKMNZju9jTwg4Jpd7xXHJ5q7FwQ8MPz0jAYQISkNKuJuWOYDKPwT+Y6txgKb R861BAnVEnPYadw1CNefwHy2E+jSyI8bsooZs= Original-Received: by 10.239.184.80 with SMTP id x16mr1018606hbg.88.1272665630131; Fri, 30 Apr 2010 15:13:50 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: by 10.239.164.81 with HTTP; Fri, 30 Apr 2010 15:13:30 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 2) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:124370 Archived-At: On Sat, May 1, 2010 at 12:02 AM, Jan Dj=C3=A4rv wrote: > > > 30 apr 2010 kl. 22.54 skrev Stefan Monnier : > >> >> I see, thanks. =C2=A0I don't know if there's a word for such things unde= r X11 >> (I guess we should ask the freedesktop guys). > > You can tell the window manager that you would like to be topmost, but th= e > window manager is free to ignore your request. You cant know for sure wha= t > will happen. Thanks Jan. But how are tooltip frames handled on X by Emacs then? On w32 you can say that a window (on a level corresponding to Emacs frame) should be topmost. This is ortogonal to activating the app. And the topmost property is per window, not per app. Is this the same (sub)structure as on X?