From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Glenn Morris Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: emacs-22.0.99 configure problem Date: Wed, 02 May 2007 19:49:54 -0400 Message-ID: References: <87zm4pg50l.fsf@penguin.cs.ucla.edu> <87ps5kne6p.fsf@penguin.cs.ucla.edu> <46390E6D.3070107@gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1178149980 24804 80.91.229.12 (2 May 2007 23:53:00 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 2 May 2007 23:53:00 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Eli Zaretskii , eggert@CS.UCLA.EDU, rms@gnu.org, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Jason Rumney Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu May 03 01:52:56 2007 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1HjOcv-0000a0-Dm for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 03 May 2007 01:52:53 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1HjOjN-0001AM-LO for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 02 May 2007 19:59:33 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1HjOjK-00014s-0e for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 02 May 2007 19:59:30 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1HjOjH-0000yK-Pj for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 02 May 2007 19:59:28 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1HjOjH-0000yC-Jp for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 02 May 2007 19:59:27 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([199.232.76.164]) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1HjOco-0003Qi-KO for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 02 May 2007 19:52:46 -0400 Original-Received: from [127.0.0.1] (helo=localhost) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1HjOa3-000135-4r; Wed, 02 May 2007 19:49:55 -0400 X-Spook: rs9512c Capricorn M-14 Mena Saddam Hussein ASDIC Aladdin X-Ran: 9zu0?Ck1g[}h`7tcZq_jI>1vgaY{C{J{(ycA6F]4Q-:"O>,;~{K{DVI9<&O4 X-Hue: green X-Attribution: GM In-Reply-To: <46390E6D.3070107@gnu.org> (Jason Rumney's message of "Wed, 02 May 2007 23:19:25 +0100") User-Agent: Gnus (www.gnus.org), GNU Emacs (www.gnu.org/software/emacs/) X-detected-kernel: Linux 2.6, seldom 2.4 (older, 4) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:70496 Archived-At: Jason Rumney wrote: > My interpretation was that this would be a one-off manual edit so we > can release 22.1 without the risk of running into bugs introduced by > a new version of autoconf. Fine. I can do it later this evening. > After the release we will have plenty of time to upgrade to the > latest autoconf and find and fix any such bugs. So that means bumping the required version of autoconf on the release branch after the release to the very very latest version of autoconf, all to tweak the wording of a message. Which is also fine (people don't usually need autoconf to build a release), but to me seems needless.