From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Glenn Morris Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel,gmane.emacs.pretest.bugs Subject: Re: incomplete comment colorization in terminals Date: Thu, 13 Mar 2008 14:55:21 -0400 Message-ID: References: <20080311231514.B718249C0BB@daedalus.stanford.edu> <200803120445.m2C4jcDe015828@sallyv1.ics.uci.edu> <200803130640.m2D6eoM5011012@sallyv1.ics.uci.edu> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1205434538 31569 80.91.229.12 (13 Mar 2008 18:55:38 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 13 Mar 2008 18:55:38 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Rob Riepel , emacs-pretest-bug@gnu.org, Dan Nicolaescu To: Stefan Monnier Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Mar 13 19:56:06 2008 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1JZsay-0002Y4-8B for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 13 Mar 2008 19:56:04 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1JZsaP-0001Lp-7q for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 13 Mar 2008 14:55:29 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1JZsaL-0001KN-0s for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 13 Mar 2008 14:55:25 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1JZsaI-0001GB-Gr for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 13 Mar 2008 14:55:24 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1JZsaI-0001G8-DB for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 13 Mar 2008 14:55:22 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([140.186.70.10]) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1JZsaI-0006m7-4m for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 13 Mar 2008 14:55:22 -0400 Original-Received: from rgm by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.67) (envelope-from ) id 1JZsaH-0000GI-El; Thu, 13 Mar 2008 14:55:21 -0400 X-Spook: Guantanamo Waco, Texas corporate security Security X-Ran: (IGU.c"Q>{Z,lE|NG7{N)&^ksCf{ormr:%tAe(}A]B3w_o.bk^;_GF\9K^x_C&3xP`Wm*E X-Hue: black X-Attribution: GM In-Reply-To: (Stefan Monnier's message of "Thu, 13 Mar 2008 11:01:18 -0400") User-Agent: Gnus (www.gnus.org), GNU Emacs (www.gnu.org/software/emacs/) X-detected-kernel: by monty-python.gnu.org: Linux 2.6, seldom 2.4 (older, 4) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:92426 gmane.emacs.pretest.bugs:21558 Archived-At: Stefan Monnier wrote: >> Should we add a new entry for emacs-22.2 to correct these issues? > > Yes, please. I already did. >> It might be too close to the release, but maybe we could apply the >> change for the light background case? > > If noone objects, it's fine by me. I don't mean to be difficult, but I wouldn't. Default font settings are ridiculously controversial, and I think it's best to just leave well alone at this stage.