From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Miguel Guedes Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: clang/emacs/ecb/semantic Date: Tue, 04 Dec 2012 14:05:15 +0000 Message-ID: References: <20940A983D814C6192ABFF2B7A269A88@gmail.com> <87wqx42nag.fsf@yandex.ru> <87ehjcrw70.fsf@engster.org> <87hao816w4.fsf@wanadoo.es> <87hao7ioos.fsf@kuiper.lan.informatimago.com> <87zk1yhib2.fsf@kuiper.lan.informatimago.com> <87y5hg3jv1.fsf@uwakimon.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1354630222 29188 80.91.229.3 (4 Dec 2012 14:10:22 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 4 Dec 2012 14:10:22 +0000 (UTC) To: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Dec 04 15:10:35 2012 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1TftCc-0005nx-UH for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 04 Dec 2012 15:10:27 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:42091 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TftCQ-0001ow-Vq for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 04 Dec 2012 09:10:14 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:38937) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TftCJ-0001jX-55 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 04 Dec 2012 09:10:13 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TftC9-0002Gm-Lg for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 04 Dec 2012 09:10:07 -0500 Original-Received: from plane.gmane.org ([80.91.229.3]:47843) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TftC9-0002Gg-FA for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 04 Dec 2012 09:09:57 -0500 Original-Received: from list by plane.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1TftCG-0005Fu-1b for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 04 Dec 2012 15:10:04 +0100 Original-Received: from 02dc0849.bb.sky.com ([2.220.8.73]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Tue, 04 Dec 2012 15:10:04 +0100 Original-Received: from miguel.a.guedes by 02dc0849.bb.sky.com with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Tue, 04 Dec 2012 15:10:04 +0100 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ Original-Lines: 17 Original-X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: 02dc0849.bb.sky.com User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:17.0) Gecko/17.0 Thunderbird/17.0 In-Reply-To: X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Genre and OS details not recognized. X-Received-From: 80.91.229.3 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:155241 Archived-At: On 04/12/12 00:40, Richard Stallman wrote: > No, the AGPL covers the case of giving people remote access to use a > program. > Shouldn't an effort then be made to create a software license or tweak/upgrade an existing one to ensure free software cannot be used in ways that go against its very philosophy? I understand your wish to ensure free software remains free not matter what, but restricting the freedom of users of free software should not be the solution; in fact this sounds like a contradiction in itself. How can placing restrictions on what's supposed to be free ever be part of the solution? -- Miguel