From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stefan Monnier Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Opportunistic STARTTLS in smtpmail.el Date: Thu, 02 Jun 2011 01:09:36 -0300 Message-ID: References: <874o5cfui5.fsf@lifelogs.com> <87liyndz5l.fsf@lifelogs.com> <87y61nnpoq.fsf@lifelogs.com> <87fwnuacc5.fsf@lifelogs.com> <878vtmo081.fsf@lifelogs.com> <87tycamhmv.fsf@lifelogs.com> <87pqmxvfoh.fsf@lifelogs.com> <87sjrttwh8.fsf@lifelogs.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1306987808 4281 80.91.229.12 (2 Jun 2011 04:10:08 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 2 Jun 2011 04:10:08 +0000 (UTC) To: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Jun 02 06:10:05 2011 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([140.186.70.17]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1QRzER-0002gw-GP for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 02 Jun 2011 06:10:03 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:43684 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QRzEQ-0007Y7-Li for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 02 Jun 2011 00:10:02 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:43737) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QRzE7-0007Xm-3i for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 02 Jun 2011 00:09:43 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QRzE5-0005Z9-0y for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 02 Jun 2011 00:09:42 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([140.186.70.10]:36831) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QRzE4-0005Z3-No for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 02 Jun 2011 00:09:40 -0400 Original-Received: from 121-249-126-200.fibertel.com.ar ([200.126.249.121]:15820 helo=ceviche.home) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QRzE4-0005tq-9T; Thu, 02 Jun 2011 00:09:40 -0400 Original-Received: by ceviche.home (Postfix, from userid 20848) id CC1D6660DD; Thu, 2 Jun 2011 01:09:36 -0300 (ART) In-Reply-To: <87sjrttwh8.fsf@lifelogs.com> (Ted Zlatanov's message of "Wed, 01 Jun 2011 10:14:27 -0500") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.0.50 (gnu/linux) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) X-Received-From: 140.186.70.10 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:140048 Archived-At: > From my perspective the chief benefit is that any `auth-source-search' > call against an unencrypted file will not require a passphrase until the > password is actually needed, and yet the password will be stored > securely. Sounds OK. But only if you push if further and deprecate authinfo.gpg. Stefan