From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stefan Monnier Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Does not byte-compile return the compiled function in Emacs 24? Date: Tue, 06 Dec 2011 20:36:36 -0500 Message-ID: References: NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1323221813 896 80.91.229.12 (7 Dec 2011 01:36:53 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 7 Dec 2011 01:36:53 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Emacs-Devel devel To: Lennart Borgman Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Dec 07 02:36:49 2011 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([140.186.70.17]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1RY6RC-0007xy-LF for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 07 Dec 2011 02:36:46 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:57267 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RY6RB-0004nh-UC for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 06 Dec 2011 20:36:45 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:43000) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RY6R9-0004nY-OO for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 06 Dec 2011 20:36:44 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RY6R8-0002yz-Ji for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 06 Dec 2011 20:36:43 -0500 Original-Received: from pruche.dit.umontreal.ca ([132.204.246.22]:54819) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RY6R8-0002yv-CS for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 06 Dec 2011 20:36:42 -0500 Original-Received: from pastel.home (lechon.iro.umontreal.ca [132.204.27.242]) by pruche.dit.umontreal.ca (8.14.1/8.14.1) with ESMTP id pB71acZU015281; Tue, 6 Dec 2011 20:36:39 -0500 Original-Received: by pastel.home (Postfix, from userid 20848) id D684D593FF; Tue, 6 Dec 2011 20:36:36 -0500 (EST) In-Reply-To: (Lennart Borgman's message of "Wed, 7 Dec 2011 01:38:02 +0100") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.0.91 (gnu/linux) X-NAI-Spam-Flag: NO X-NAI-Spam-Level: X-NAI-Spam-Threshold: 5 X-NAI-Spam-Score: 0.2 X-NAI-Spam-Rules: 2 Rules triggered GEN_SPAM_FEATRE=0.2, RV4063=0 X-NAI-Spam-Version: 2.2.0.9309 : core <4063> : streams <708439> : uri <1023084> X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Genre and OS details not recognized. X-Received-From: 132.204.246.22 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:146521 Archived-At: > It used to do that before. Is there any variable holding the newly > byte-compiled function? Don't know. `byte-compile' does various things in various circumstances (it's pretty DWIMish), so without more details I can't help you. Stefan