From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stefan Monnier Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: inlinable functions instead of macros Date: Tue, 21 Aug 2012 13:50:10 -0400 Message-ID: References: <502EDAF3.6030005@cs.ucla.edu> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1345598392 9677 80.91.229.3 (22 Aug 2012 01:19:52 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 22 Aug 2012 01:19:52 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Paul Eggert Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Aug 22 03:19:53 2012 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1T3zbs-0007LI-Gp for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 22 Aug 2012 03:19:52 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:35211 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1T3zbq-00013W-HP for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 21 Aug 2012 21:19:50 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:34733) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1T3zbl-0000rq-OW for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 21 Aug 2012 21:19:46 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1T3zbk-0007eF-KD for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 21 Aug 2012 21:19:45 -0400 Original-Received: from chene.dit.umontreal.ca ([132.204.246.20]:59526) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1T3zbk-0007dw-Fy for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 21 Aug 2012 21:19:44 -0400 Original-Received: from fmsmemgm.homelinux.net (lechon.iro.umontreal.ca [132.204.27.242]) by chene.dit.umontreal.ca (8.14.1/8.14.1) with ESMTP id q7M1JYFh032766; Tue, 21 Aug 2012 21:19:34 -0400 Original-Received: by fmsmemgm.homelinux.net (Postfix, from userid 20848) id D92B0AE3CE; Tue, 21 Aug 2012 13:50:10 -0400 (EDT) In-Reply-To: <502EDAF3.6030005@cs.ucla.edu> (Paul Eggert's message of "Fri, 17 Aug 2012 16:59:47 -0700") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.1.50 (gnu/linux) X-NAI-Spam-Flag: NO X-NAI-Spam-Threshold: 5 X-NAI-Spam-Score: 0 X-NAI-Spam-Rules: 1 Rules triggered RV4317=0 X-NAI-Spam-Version: 2.2.0.9309 : core <4317> : streams <803545> : uri <1198787> X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Genre and OS details not recognized. X-Received-From: 132.204.246.20 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:152726 Archived-At: Could some please check our inlinable functions and move any easserts in them to a macro (i.e. rename the function, replace the old name with a macro that does the assert and calls the inlinable function)? If someone wants to *additionally* provide a patch to use glibc's `backtrace' in our `eassert' that's fine, but the two are separate issues. Stefan