From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stefan Monnier Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: /srv/bzr/emacs/trunk r111061: Fix for bad test in ruby-mode-tests.el. Date: Mon, 03 Dec 2012 14:48:40 -0500 Message-ID: References: <878v9groov.fsf@yandex.ru> <87ehj7hiy7.fsf@gnu.org> <50BCF33B.4080809@yandex.ru> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1354564129 18559 80.91.229.3 (3 Dec 2012 19:48:49 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 3 Dec 2012 19:48:49 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Chong Yidong , emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Dmitry Gutov Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Dec 03 20:49:01 2012 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Tfc0h-0007SR-OR for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 03 Dec 2012 20:48:59 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:52664 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Tfc0W-0000s3-3O for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 03 Dec 2012 14:48:48 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:38456) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Tfc0U-0000rw-H2 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 03 Dec 2012 14:48:47 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Tfc0T-0006ZM-7y for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 03 Dec 2012 14:48:46 -0500 Original-Received: from chene.dit.umontreal.ca ([132.204.246.20]:51834) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Tfc0S-0006YY-D3; Mon, 03 Dec 2012 14:48:45 -0500 Original-Received: from faina.iro.umontreal.ca (lechon.iro.umontreal.ca [132.204.27.242]) by chene.dit.umontreal.ca (8.14.1/8.14.1) with ESMTP id qB3Jme7X030884; Mon, 3 Dec 2012 14:48:40 -0500 Original-Received: by faina.iro.umontreal.ca (Postfix, from userid 20848) id 7A9FDB415D; Mon, 3 Dec 2012 14:48:40 -0500 (EST) In-Reply-To: <50BCF33B.4080809@yandex.ru> (Dmitry Gutov's message of "Mon, 03 Dec 2012 22:45:15 +0400") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.3.50 (gnu/linux) X-NAI-Spam-Flag: NO X-NAI-Spam-Threshold: 5 X-NAI-Spam-Score: 0 X-NAI-Spam-Rules: 1 Rules triggered RV4421=0 X-NAI-Spam-Version: 2.2.0.9309 : core <4421> : streams <870549> : uri <1284364> X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Genre and OS details not recognized. X-Received-From: 132.204.246.20 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:155208 Archived-At: > What about the third question? Last time I've seen a discussion about > whitespace style in Emacs codebase, I think it was somewhat of a consensus > that spaces > tabs (which is also my preference), but doing whitespace-only > commits was declared verboten, so I can't just revert that part of > the change. There are better things to do in life than worry about how the whitespace you don't see is represented internally, Stefan