From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stefan Monnier Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: managing windows in two frames Date: Tue, 03 Sep 2013 10:30:39 -0400 Message-ID: References: <8561uiclrj.fsf@stephe-leake.org> <5225EF0F.1090109@gmx.at> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1378218660 17231 80.91.229.3 (3 Sep 2013 14:31:00 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 3 Sep 2013 14:31:00 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Stephen Leake , emacs-devel@gnu.org To: martin rudalics Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Sep 03 16:31:02 2013 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1VGrdG-0007Cf-FT for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 03 Sep 2013 16:31:02 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:46536 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1VGrdF-0000FY-Ue for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 03 Sep 2013 10:31:01 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:56685) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1VGrd6-0000EB-8N for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 03 Sep 2013 10:30:59 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1VGrcv-00027Z-LK for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 03 Sep 2013 10:30:52 -0400 Original-Received: from ironport2-out.teksavvy.com ([206.248.154.182]:55046) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1VGrcv-00027L-Bv for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 03 Sep 2013 10:30:41 -0400 X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: At0KABK/CFHO+KK6/2dsb2JhbABEvg0EAnsXc4IeAQEEAVYjEAs0EhQYDSSIHgaxH5AOkQoDpHqBXoMT X-IPAS-Result: At0KABK/CFHO+KK6/2dsb2JhbABEvg0EAnsXc4IeAQEEAVYjEAs0EhQYDSSIHgaxH5AOkQoDpHqBXoMT X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.84,565,1355115600"; d="scan'208";a="26305524" Original-Received: from 206-248-162-186.dsl.teksavvy.com (HELO pastel.home) ([206.248.162.186]) by ironport2-out.teksavvy.com with ESMTP/TLS/ADH-AES256-SHA; 03 Sep 2013 10:27:42 -0400 Original-Received: by pastel.home (Postfix, from userid 20848) id D5970631D3; Tue, 3 Sep 2013 10:30:39 -0400 (EDT) In-Reply-To: <5225EF0F.1090109@gmx.at> (martin rudalics's message of "Tue, 03 Sep 2013 16:15:43 +0200") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.3.50 (gnu/linux) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Genre and OS details not recognized. X-Received-From: 206.248.154.182 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:163164 Archived-At: >> That sounds wrong: inhibit-switch-frame means to not use another frame, > `inhibit-switch-frame' non-nil means to not raise (and implicitly > select) another frame. Hmm... I misunderstood (and misused) it, then. How do I tell display-buffer to not use another frame (I typically do that when I want to make sure save-window-excursion will properly undo the damage)? Stefan