From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Stefan Monnier Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs,gmane.emacs.devel Subject: bug#21072: Brave new mark-defun (and a testing tool) Date: Thu, 16 Feb 2017 08:22:20 -0500 Message-ID: References: <87o9ydrzkr.fsf@mbork.pl> <87mvdriuss.fsf@mbork.pl> <87bmu6icea.fsf@mbork.pl> <87wpctgieu.fsf@mbork.pl> <52e67f43-edcf-09e3-5fd6-6079763fd234@yandex.ru> <87tw7wh9sf.fsf@mbork.pl> <87k28sdka6.fsf@jane> <87efyze00g.fsf@jane> <87bmu2eoji.fsf@jane> NNTP-Posting-Host: blaine.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: blaine.gmane.org 1487251400 18812 195.159.176.226 (16 Feb 2017 13:23:20 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 16 Feb 2017 13:23:20 +0000 (UTC) User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/26.0.50 (gnu/linux) Cc: 21072@debbugs.gnu.org, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Marcin Borkowski Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Feb 16 14:23:16 2017 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1ceM1i-0004OY-JO for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Thu, 16 Feb 2017 14:23:14 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:46618 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ceM1o-0001hr-AS for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Thu, 16 Feb 2017 08:23:20 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:59550) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ceM1b-0001ff-Q9 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 16 Feb 2017 08:23:08 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ceM1W-0003di-07 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 16 Feb 2017 08:23:07 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:43585) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ceM1V-0003de-Sp for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 16 Feb 2017 08:23:01 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1ceM1V-0007mD-NB for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 16 Feb 2017 08:23:01 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Stefan Monnier Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Thu, 16 Feb 2017 13:23:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 21072 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 21072-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B21072.148725134829840 (code B ref 21072); Thu, 16 Feb 2017 13:23:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 21072) by debbugs.gnu.org; 16 Feb 2017 13:22:28 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:41781 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1ceM0x-0007lE-OB for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 16 Feb 2017 08:22:27 -0500 Original-Received: from ironport2-out.teksavvy.com ([206.248.154.181]:61818) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1ceM0w-0007l0-2c for 21072@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 16 Feb 2017 08:22:26 -0500 X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: A0CnCQCjpqVY/56dpUVeGgEBAQECAQEBAQgBAQEBg1GEdYVWhXKRHikBlxWGHAQCAoIVRBQBAgEBAQEBAQFiKIRxAQQBViMFCwsOJhIUGA0kiXcIsl+LOwEBAQcCASWLO4o5BY9Gfos7k3oBiEyGVpFVgUM2IYEAIBQIKocfIopsAQEB X-IPAS-Result: A0CnCQCjpqVY/56dpUVeGgEBAQECAQEBAQgBAQEBg1GEdYVWhXKRHikBlxWGHAQCAoIVRBQBAgEBAQEBAQFiKIRxAQQBViMFCwsOJhIUGA0kiXcIsl+LOwEBAQcCASWLO4o5BY9Gfos7k3oBiEyGVpFVgUM2IYEAIBQIKocfIopsAQEB X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.35,169,1484024400"; d="scan'208";a="293051317" Original-Received: from 69-165-157-158.dsl.teksavvy.com (HELO pastel.home) ([69.165.157.158]) by smtp.teksavvy.com with ESMTP; 16 Feb 2017 08:22:20 -0500 Original-Received: by pastel.home (Postfix, from userid 20848) id 1F37765017; Thu, 16 Feb 2017 08:22:20 -0500 (EST) In-Reply-To: <87bmu2eoji.fsf@jane> (Marcin Borkowski's message of "Thu, 16 Feb 2017 05:40:33 +0100") X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 208.118.235.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:129406 gmane.emacs.devel:212420 Archived-At: > Understood. Do you have then any better idea for the name of this > function? beginning-of-defun--incomment-line-p seems to specific, > in-comment-line-p _may_ be indeed too general. I'll let someone else decide if it deserves a "non-prefixed" name, but as for the name after the potential prefix, I think focusing on "comment" is the wrong idea. Maybe `insignificant-line-p`? Or `emptyish-line-p`? Stefan