From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.ciao.gmane.io!not-for-mail From: Stefan Monnier Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Request: add cl-font-lock to Emacs or Elpa Date: Thu, 19 Mar 2020 13:15:14 -0400 Message-ID: References: <56660D97-604F-4C15-8961-D35F07E6F29B@spensertruex.com> <3e25feef-0908-41a0-8f54-eb0dc50cce90@default> <87v9n0bg8u.fsf@home.i-did-not-set--mail-host-address--so-tickle-me> <87r1xobe62.fsf@home.i-did-not-set--mail-host-address--so-tickle-me> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="ciao.gmane.io:159.69.161.202"; logging-data="114492"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/28.0.50 (gnu/linux) Cc: Spenser , Spenser Truex , Drew Adams , emacs-devel To: YUE Daian Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Thu Mar 19 18:16:00 2020 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1jEym0-000Tez-58 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Thu, 19 Mar 2020 18:16:00 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:40850 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jEylz-0007DO-4k for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Thu, 19 Mar 2020 13:15:59 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:59664) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jEylL-0006Ly-OL for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 19 Mar 2020 13:15:20 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1jEylK-0002a9-Bk for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 19 Mar 2020 13:15:19 -0400 Original-Received: from mailscanner.iro.umontreal.ca ([132.204.25.50]:49731) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1jEylK-0002X9-4B for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 19 Mar 2020 13:15:18 -0400 Original-Received: from pmg1.iro.umontreal.ca (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by pmg1.iro.umontreal.ca (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 6459810075B; Thu, 19 Mar 2020 13:15:17 -0400 (EDT) Original-Received: from mail01.iro.umontreal.ca (unknown [172.31.2.1]) by pmg1.iro.umontreal.ca (Proxmox) with ESMTP id C3CEB1006D1; Thu, 19 Mar 2020 13:15:15 -0400 (EDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=iro.umontreal.ca; s=mail; t=1584638115; bh=hCU9UrbU/ZiQGkprnEmhXLBW8Zs2Bls97/VyZfP/+XY=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:References:Date:In-Reply-To:From; b=TwnJ4EGPqG2Y07yCOyprMp+MgErklElUtXShfsTsmRcsl7YVKtdKZvxJ8gHloN9/G dzfqFT9hLLxtzjwYVup41f6nu9XfaOzc4cpyTtgzexaOkEAUpCgnGbRBAIWCLsbWFZ 8J7xGr/Fy5BkHWNjtxWgAmt8ceMKM0pP5U1PaMIutVqkcmm+zrEiaddXDTi9eZ89Mc l4HGRB92r9FQcsRrPHE1EcuGgCz+DbdcqOfJ+lNeZicQb/cGZxR1iCSiFOPw/fnoYL WUawWbcoHzivepkKK22glk7oqFcbypp+IIwKD4oCbKQD+WmD6daaTqhsn775PyU0Tm v6o0R1lvpIXEg== Original-Received: from alfajor (unknown [104.247.241.114]) by mail01.iro.umontreal.ca (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 7466112085A; Thu, 19 Mar 2020 13:15:15 -0400 (EDT) In-Reply-To: <87r1xobe62.fsf@home.i-did-not-set--mail-host-address--so-tickle-me> (YUE Daian's message of "Thu, 19 Mar 2020 22:41:09 +0800") X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 132.204.25.50 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:245582 Archived-At: >>> I also wonder how you made those lists? Have you extracted them from >>> the CLHS? If so, it would be good to include (e.g. as comments) the >>> code&steps that was used. >>> [ I'm also curious why things like make-method and next-method-p are in >>> built-in--symbols rather than in built-in--functions. ] > They are not extracted from CLHS. They are extracted from a SBCL image. Works as well ;-) Do you still have the code you used to extract it, so we can keep it around (e.g. to update the list at some point, or just as documentation)? > As for the 2 functions...it is because they are "local function/macro", > which was not recognized as "function". Doesn't this apply to `call-next-method` as well, then? > Spenser suggested me to sign the copyright paperwork. > And I am more than willing to do so. > So...where do we start now? ;-) Sent off-list, Stefan