From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.ciao.gmane.io!not-for-mail From: Stefan Monnier Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Optional support for GDI+ on Windows (emacs-28) Date: Tue, 31 Mar 2020 15:37:18 -0400 Message-ID: References: <86lfnh8wzn.fsf@csic.es> <83pncs1ulv.fsf@gnu.org> <86ftdoedvh.fsf@csic.es> <83d08s1nf9.fsf@gnu.org> <831rp81kfs.fsf@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="ciao.gmane.io:159.69.161.202"; logging-data="72587"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/28.0.50 (gnu/linux) Cc: juanjose.garciaripoll@gmail.com, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Tue Mar 31 21:38:04 2020 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1jJMi4-000IoR-6H for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Tue, 31 Mar 2020 21:38:04 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:43496 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jJMi3-0005Mu-7P for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Tue, 31 Mar 2020 15:38:03 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:40481) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jJMhZ-0004y3-GM for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 31 Mar 2020 15:37:34 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1jJMhY-0007mA-J2 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 31 Mar 2020 15:37:33 -0400 Original-Received: from mailscanner.iro.umontreal.ca ([132.204.25.50]:58020) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1jJMhW-0007kq-2R; Tue, 31 Mar 2020 15:37:30 -0400 Original-Received: from pmg1.iro.umontreal.ca (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by pmg1.iro.umontreal.ca (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 41378100E11; Tue, 31 Mar 2020 15:37:29 -0400 (EDT) Original-Received: from mail01.iro.umontreal.ca (unknown [172.31.2.1]) by pmg1.iro.umontreal.ca (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 7ED8310035B; Tue, 31 Mar 2020 15:37:20 -0400 (EDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=iro.umontreal.ca; s=mail; t=1585683440; bh=jLUf2527kz/UAHhlJbIVAHkqeKP+kXrZ0G5wcb04Rzg=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:References:Date:In-Reply-To:From; b=F03SSgayNgjWC1d7l+T5v33QS9ZNLjMbQ3iOWXCeeMdOUtnh1BN69MOMD5wQaLnlL drGGM6fX94OJEvXJjlghf8l1jUVsGKI9/Z3rDHuZrDKl7JaJmTDEra7vKwMnSlhB8d zLzj//aYLUV/kNHbAiAC1ELGT+KMZdwC0HdcjxFXmX0ZoQkzvHCLNm10lA2DaooxZC qk2P4GBIPOOpBvZsoA+8G4gLHnblTqAqEtpobex8yDiJYzRPenSkSaqZtFqgn8pjpI X3ZY7TefjOd7iDcY+hVR4WBar2CR5x0f6jw95lXt80w89RkAUAB1ZemSiVF0Y3vJuf sdmsNnURmOLjw== Original-Received: from alfajor (unknown [104.247.241.114]) by mail01.iro.umontreal.ca (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 22DAB1205FB; Tue, 31 Mar 2020 15:37:20 -0400 (EDT) In-Reply-To: <831rp81kfs.fsf@gnu.org> (Eli Zaretskii's message of "Tue, 31 Mar 2020 20:52:07 +0300") X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 132.204.25.50 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:246156 Archived-At: >> > we should provide variables to control whether GDI+ is used for each >> > supported image format. HAVE_GDIPLUS should guard code which uses >> > GDI+, but it should NOT decide whether that code is actually used. >> Why bother? > Because I requested it. I understand this part, but really there's a good chance this is wasted effort. The NS port didn't have to jump through those hoops to get its code accepted. Stefan