From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stefan Monnier Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Stepping Back: A Wealth Of Completion systems Re: [ELPA] New package: vertico Date: Sat, 10 Apr 2021 00:04:14 -0400 Message-ID: References: <9c9af088-580f-9fb1-4d79-237a74ce605c@inventati.org> <874kgkxxs0.fsf@posteo.net> <78741fe6-2612-d7c9-2bc4-0b68ea7fa51a@yandex.ru> <76a4d0e2-117b-165d-d56e-5bc2f504b50c@yandex.ru> <87blapln0r.fsf@posteo.net> <37bd2e96-ce04-eb6d-24da-fdd7ea427e61@yandex.ru> <87im4wx2ct.fsf@posteo.net> <83ft0080hi.fsf@gnu.org> <16784f40-b959-9a84-65d4-93b71d1bebec@yandex.ru> <5d5d0152-bb07-1bdd-6370-9498d4e4b867@yandex.ru> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="37722"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/28.0.50 (gnu/linux) Cc: Eli Zaretskii , philipk@posteo.net, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Dmitry Gutov Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Sat Apr 10 06:05:42 2021 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1lV4sQ-0009h3-J9 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Sat, 10 Apr 2021 06:05:42 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:49534 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lV4sP-0001a0-7x for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Sat, 10 Apr 2021 00:05:41 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:53856) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lV4r8-00018D-1F for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 10 Apr 2021 00:04:22 -0400 Original-Received: from mailscanner.iro.umontreal.ca ([132.204.25.50]:7635) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lV4r5-0007ID-FV; Sat, 10 Apr 2021 00:04:21 -0400 Original-Received: from pmg3.iro.umontreal.ca (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pmg3.iro.umontreal.ca (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 14434441202; Sat, 10 Apr 2021 00:04:18 -0400 (EDT) Original-Received: from mail01.iro.umontreal.ca (unknown [172.31.2.1]) by pmg3.iro.umontreal.ca (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 825A6440C78; Sat, 10 Apr 2021 00:04:16 -0400 (EDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=iro.umontreal.ca; s=mail; t=1618027456; bh=qabcIIhCAhqL6SiO5cR9sNrBUMyLaHF8Q2MYHe/YdU0=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:References:Date:In-Reply-To:From; b=IF500zwSuVSvusshFzjF5HyTT+6MK4+Ui8Qb3jdjYpjodsD4KjO0yh49ZDyu8KhHk cnhm45FbiRi3iKE6W9+srrf7ooFc87MB2c2AQ1qiKM/Aw0HKzhr6dt4IRiNE5tFuhG w41X53sPPnRNfi1w/1kISvIDGM93gcgKDfVOCIwWCfUG3m8jROO1OD0rIELWFLS3iz Jk+HZiprci467TFURZg9VPOMfMY/3vseCeNf4C2mkhnLR8lB7iGuGPSe+rXvdYf/9l dk00yc1F9FPLOZQTqnA+hkb47Ez00ndZnzhSSOIYz/oqzmAMDsFj8okRXb9pnHDvbz uJWMWUc/wxOJA== Original-Received: from alfajor (104-222-126-84.cpe.teksavvy.com [104.222.126.84]) by mail01.iro.umontreal.ca (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 425921207AC; Sat, 10 Apr 2021 00:04:16 -0400 (EDT) In-Reply-To: <5d5d0152-bb07-1bdd-6370-9498d4e4b867@yandex.ru> (Dmitry Gutov's message of "Sat, 10 Apr 2021 04:56:52 +0300") Received-SPF: pass client-ip=132.204.25.50; envelope-from=monnier@iro.umontreal.ca; helo=mailscanner.iro.umontreal.ca X-Spam_score_int: -42 X-Spam_score: -4.3 X-Spam_bar: ---- X-Spam_report: (-4.3 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:267765 Archived-At: >> I think it would be desirable to change the default UI just enough so >> that a code like Xref can make `completing-read` display the >> completions eagerly. > The *Completions* window, you mean? I was thinking of a somewhat generic way to tell the UI that the list should be shown eagerly. Presumably the default UI would react to it by displaying the *Completions* window, yes. > It would still miss the ability to quickly accept one of them > with RET. Right, but the cycle-threshold helps with that, no? Stefan