From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stefan Monnier Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: [ELPA] New package: taxy-magit-section Date: Thu, 07 Oct 2021 13:21:26 -0400 Message-ID: References: <877df6cyqu.fsf@alphapapa.net> <87pmsti6mg.fsf@alphapapa.net> <87ilycvv3b.fsf@alphapapa.net> <87bl407pfs.fsf@alphapapa.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="18822"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/28.0.50 (gnu/linux) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Adam Porter Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Thu Oct 07 19:28:50 2021 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1mYXCM-0004jC-Ez for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Thu, 07 Oct 2021 19:28:50 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:46460 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mYXCL-0006Yh-CA for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Thu, 07 Oct 2021 13:28:49 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:60844) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mYX69-000170-Aw for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 07 Oct 2021 13:22:26 -0400 Original-Received: from mailscanner.iro.umontreal.ca ([132.204.25.50]:14480) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mYX66-00014g-AU for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 07 Oct 2021 13:22:24 -0400 Original-Received: from pmg1.iro.umontreal.ca (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by pmg1.iro.umontreal.ca (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 3CB701003D2; Thu, 7 Oct 2021 13:22:19 -0400 (EDT) Original-Received: from mail01.iro.umontreal.ca (unknown [172.31.2.1]) by pmg1.iro.umontreal.ca (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 8FD8A10018A; Thu, 7 Oct 2021 13:22:17 -0400 (EDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=iro.umontreal.ca; s=mail; t=1633627337; bh=ydsEjTmHBzNXDUeoZdoN8vf8E9y/0Txc8ZJXLpMm0YE=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:References:Date:In-Reply-To:From; b=bcM2kaM3mL/cKqcdBqdJaaTN5ar/eotmmrE89lznjrD56dyZV+vECf93jrLAujbPH BsdGP4CK5IvBJO+5I0rUymLmfNRQv2cuYbRmV4nX3IZaC1U/uB9LOrx6wcZgwwenFY zMQcSbD0iKmg0LvOMUWixHKmiwuKYLDaLYpF5BO5BBJQi6WzMXrn7IZFb1VNGrkUzO x7qdF+PJzlbQuhx2v+4cRLBQZWIj8tlMn/SpUKloOEDOUi24GsqtKi1qXU3ZyQygOz 4FoZz8z+4ECi/lv4GQqFKfa9PrmjOiGL/ydQKQbeCmba1tRynKWLivkr9DrH/olL7o xs7NmEPK+VgxQ== Original-Received: from alfajor (lechon.iro.umontreal.ca [132.204.27.242]) by mail01.iro.umontreal.ca (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 59078120257; Thu, 7 Oct 2021 13:22:17 -0400 (EDT) In-Reply-To: <87bl407pfs.fsf@alphapapa.net> (Adam Porter's message of "Thu, 07 Oct 2021 11:46:47 -0500") Received-SPF: pass client-ip=132.204.25.50; envelope-from=monnier@iro.umontreal.ca; helo=mailscanner.iro.umontreal.ca X-Spam_score_int: -42 X-Spam_score: -4.3 X-Spam_bar: ---- X-Spam_report: (-4.3 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:276502 Archived-At: > I'd generally be glad to do that. I did it myself when the README.org > file is saved because that's necessary for my packages that are on > MELPA. I'm not sure what's the benefit of having packages on MELPA when they're already in GNU ELPA, to be honest. > I wouldn't mind for ELPA to do that automatically, however there > is one issue: users who install the package by other means, like with > Quelpa (as I do for some of my own packages, so I don't have to wait for > (M)ELPA to build them) or Straight wouldn't get the info manual, IIUC. They'd need to generate it, just like `elpa-admin.el` would do, indeed. > So, for now at least, I'd prefer to keep them in the repo and generate > them myself, if that's acceptable. It's fully up to you. Stefan