From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stefan Monnier Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: noverlay branch Date: Sun, 25 Sep 2022 23:17:57 -0400 Message-ID: References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="2041"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/29.0.50 (gnu/linux) Cc: emacs-devel To: Ihor Radchenko Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Mon Sep 26 05:19:17 2022 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1oceeK-0000Ko-WA for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Mon, 26 Sep 2022 05:19:17 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:58606 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1oceeJ-0007tP-QW for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Sun, 25 Sep 2022 23:19:15 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:51726) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1ocedG-000784-Pj for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 25 Sep 2022 23:18:10 -0400 Original-Received: from mailscanner.iro.umontreal.ca ([132.204.25.50]:4804) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1ocedD-00048m-QG for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 25 Sep 2022 23:18:09 -0400 Original-Received: from pmg1.iro.umontreal.ca (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by pmg1.iro.umontreal.ca (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 81147100136; Sun, 25 Sep 2022 23:18:05 -0400 (EDT) Original-Received: from mail01.iro.umontreal.ca (unknown [172.31.2.1]) by pmg1.iro.umontreal.ca (Proxmox) with ESMTP id CFED110002F; Sun, 25 Sep 2022 23:17:59 -0400 (EDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=iro.umontreal.ca; s=mail; t=1664162279; bh=BRtSMKEOIajgE9E4wUSPzuPM/tkwNEuiEAYIoOg5+wY=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:Date:From; b=I+YtKTKX7+vPBvirSe3sf7rxPDQCZt/h7UO58CHEfwdXaOL4spLkH4MM+62Kwvm1n QXV0dkJUX9ul9PSN5S5mVG5x2KwhHng+o8YsAzMWtcs7CveSXWWh6aNaqbgTUBuDaB zn04ARq7KkfD/OLL/wRQustMsLpyixczwG0RxeHnBM2tFOF/lATLdkEu7bXHx7xNHl fmJ7KujrOvLlHYWo+6ogPt5h7htl+LP+v64KYm1lSV1O+D5uoUhziARcYXDNHRXGm2 kZJ+uu29WfbvS5M6lB1vc/nagARcC+qelWikR6oUeH8VH6OdipylbqQUr4YQca1xzU FJU6bmuDFgNNQ== Original-Received: from pastel (65-110-220-202.cpe.pppoe.ca [65.110.220.202]) by mail01.iro.umontreal.ca (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 0BD621204E9; Sun, 25 Sep 2022 23:17:58 -0400 (EDT) In-Reply-To: (Ihor Radchenko's message of "Mon, 26 Sep 2022 10:52:11 +0800") Received-SPF: pass client-ip=132.204.25.50; envelope-from=monnier@iro.umontreal.ca; helo=mailscanner.iro.umontreal.ca X-Spam_score_int: -42 X-Spam_score: -4.3 X-Spam_bar: ---- X-Spam_report: (-4.3 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:296246 Archived-At: > I tried with my Emacs config and after some fiddling Emacs crashed during > helm search via helm-org-ql If you can run it under GDB and provide a backtrace when you get such a crash, that would be immensely helpful (especially if you can build with `--enable-checking` and without too high an optimization level). Even better of course is a reproducible recipe. > (a lot of regexp searching). The regexp search code is largely untouched, so it's probably not directly connected (famous last word?). > I was unable to trigger the crash using unoptimized build, so just giving a > heads-up. Oh, well, thanks anyway, it's still a useful data point. Stefan