From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stefan Monnier Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Lost antialias? Date: Mon, 16 Jun 2008 12:32:39 -0400 Message-ID: References: <485230EB.9070203@alice.it> <48546807.8010406@alice.it> <87abhmgmko.fsf@stupidchicken.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1213634007 28725 80.91.229.12 (16 Jun 2008 16:33:27 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 16 Jun 2008 16:33:27 +0000 (UTC) Cc: cyd@stupidchicken.com, emacs-devel@gnu.org, angelo.graziosi@alice.it, Miles Bader To: Kenichi Handa Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Jun 16 18:34:09 2008 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1K8Heh-0007mA-T2 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 16 Jun 2008 18:34:08 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:36918 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1K8Hdt-0007MC-Lq for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 16 Jun 2008 12:33:17 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1K8Hdp-0007M5-Ni for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 16 Jun 2008 12:33:13 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1K8Hdn-0007Lt-8K for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 16 Jun 2008 12:33:12 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=58285 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1K8Hdn-0007Lq-30 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 16 Jun 2008 12:33:11 -0400 Original-Received: from mercure.iro.umontreal.ca ([132.204.24.67]:38257) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1K8Hdi-00054k-FU; Mon, 16 Jun 2008 12:33:06 -0400 Original-Received: from hidalgo.iro.umontreal.ca (hidalgo.iro.umontreal.ca [132.204.27.50]) by mercure.iro.umontreal.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id B15522CFD2D; Mon, 16 Jun 2008 12:33:05 -0400 (EDT) Original-Received: from faina.iro.umontreal.ca (faina.iro.umontreal.ca [132.204.26.177]) by hidalgo.iro.umontreal.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id CD78D3FE1; Mon, 16 Jun 2008 12:32:39 -0400 (EDT) Original-Received: by faina.iro.umontreal.ca (Postfix, from userid 20848) id BA90941BEC; Mon, 16 Jun 2008 12:32:39 -0400 (EDT) In-Reply-To: (Kenichi Handa's message of "Mon, 16 Jun 2008 20:36:37 +0900") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.0.60 (gnu/linux) X-DIRO-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the ISP for more information X-DIRO-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-DIRO-MailScanner-SpamCheck: n'est pas un polluriel, SpamAssassin (score=-2.82, requis 5, autolearn=not spam, ALL_TRUSTED -2.82) X-DIRO-MailScanner-From: monnier@iro.umontreal.ca X-detected-kernel: by monty-python.gnu.org: Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:99306 Archived-At: >>>> Is there any reason to have x,xft by default, instead of xft,x? >> > Backward compatibility. >> Is this really very important? >> I suspect many (maybe most) people will _want_ the "incompatible" font >> when there's a conflict. > Until the code gets more stable, I'd like to keep backward > compatibility where it's easy to do that. What's the recommended way to change this option in .emacs? Stefan