From: Stefan Monnier <monnier@iro.umontreal.ca>
To: Juanma Barranquero <lekktu@gmail.com>
Cc: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>, Sean Sieger <sean.sieger@gmail.com>,
emacs-devel@gnu.org
Subject: Re: Failed to compile from last bzr repo
Date: Tue, 05 Apr 2011 09:14:38 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <jwvy63oyh9g.fsf-monnier+emacs@gnu.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <BANLkTim3Qkyu4N70-HUUhwTc7SU1c0rRXg@mail.gmail.com> (Juanma Barranquero's message of "Tue, 5 Apr 2011 00:00:02 +0200")
>> takes just a tiny bit loner (especially with -O0 and all assertions
>> enabled).
> Because of it being slower during all the .el compilations, you mean?
> I regularly build both -O2 --enable-checking and -O0 --enable-checking
> and I haven't seen much difference, but now I'm curious.
I don't know, to tell you the truth: I always compile with -O0, unions,
and all assertions I can think of enabled. And I tend to find it
significantly slower than the rare few times that I do a test
build with all default settings. But I never bothered to measure it.
Stefan
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-04-05 13:14 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-04-04 9:46 Failed to compile from last bzr repo Bastien
2011-04-04 11:53 ` Eli Zaretskii
2011-04-04 12:22 ` Deniz Dogan
2011-04-04 12:38 ` Sean Sieger
2011-04-04 17:37 ` Eli Zaretskii
2011-04-04 21:19 ` Juanma Barranquero
2011-04-04 21:51 ` Stefan Monnier
2011-04-04 22:00 ` Juanma Barranquero
2011-04-05 13:14 ` Stefan Monnier [this message]
2011-04-05 15:39 ` Sean Sieger
2011-04-05 16:36 ` Juanma Barranquero
2011-04-05 16:52 ` Eli Zaretskii
2011-04-05 22:45 ` Juanma Barranquero
2011-04-06 3:01 ` Eli Zaretskii
2011-04-06 3:22 ` Juanma Barranquero
2011-04-06 12:57 ` Andy Moreton
2011-04-06 13:32 ` Eli Zaretskii
2011-04-06 14:18 ` Juanma Barranquero
2011-04-06 15:47 ` Eli Zaretskii
2011-04-06 16:08 ` Eli Zaretskii
2011-04-06 16:18 ` Juanma Barranquero
2011-04-05 15:41 ` Sean Sieger
2011-04-05 20:57 ` Stefan Monnier
2011-04-05 0:13 ` Sean Sieger
2011-04-05 2:59 ` Eli Zaretskii
2011-04-04 16:39 ` Stefan Monnier
2011-04-04 17:35 ` Eli Zaretskii
2011-04-04 16:26 ` Bastien
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
List information: https://www.gnu.org/software/emacs/
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=jwvy63oyh9g.fsf-monnier+emacs@gnu.org \
--to=monnier@iro.umontreal.ca \
--cc=eliz@gnu.org \
--cc=emacs-devel@gnu.org \
--cc=lekktu@gmail.com \
--cc=sean.sieger@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox
https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/emacs.git
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).