From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stefan Monnier Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: 5x5 Arithmetic solver Date: Sun, 22 May 2011 16:09:34 -0300 Message-ID: References: <80lixz9ay5.fsf@gmail.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1306091401 30305 80.91.229.12 (22 May 2011 19:10:01 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 22 May 2011 19:10:01 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel To: Vincent =?iso-8859-1?Q?Bela=EFche?= Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sun May 22 21:09:58 2011 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([140.186.70.17]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1QOE2H-0004X3-Dj for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 22 May 2011 21:09:57 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:57596 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QOE2G-0007LM-Qf for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 22 May 2011 15:09:56 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:50970) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QOE2E-0007LG-P4 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 22 May 2011 15:09:55 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QOE2C-0006Hb-Ra for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 22 May 2011 15:09:54 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([140.186.70.10]:53443) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QOE2C-0006HX-P2 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 22 May 2011 15:09:52 -0400 Original-Received: from [201.254.97.247] (port=34334 helo=ceviche.home) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QOE2C-0003zc-AT; Sun, 22 May 2011 15:09:52 -0400 Original-Received: by ceviche.home (Postfix, from userid 20848) id AEC4366371; Sun, 22 May 2011 16:09:34 -0300 (ART) In-Reply-To: ("Vincent =?iso-8859-1?Q?Bela=EFche=22's?= message of "Sun, 22 May 2011 09:32:14 +0200") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.0.50 (gnu/linux) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) X-Received-From: 140.186.70.10 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:139628 Archived-At: >> Thanks. Note that usually when you add a new functions, you can just >> say "(fun1, fun2, fun3): New functions" without having to explain what >> it does. > Concerning the make-variable-local, Beware: I'm talking about make-variable-buffer-local, which is different (but I think it's what you want here). > I had the feeling that it is slightly > better practice to do an explicit "dolist" I'm not sure I understand. The way I see it, we could have a defvar-local macro, i.e. the make-variable-buffer-local really belongs next to the corresponding defvar. > --- I think that it is what is done in org-mode for instance --- at it > allows to set the variable at the same time. If you do want to use make-local-variable rather than make-variable-buffer-local, then the call to make-local-variable indeed belongs together with the corresponding `set' (we could have a setq-local macro for it). Stefan