From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stefan Monnier Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: A question about struct coding_system Date: Mon, 21 Nov 2011 15:22:34 -0500 Message-ID: References: <4ECA78BD.4040904@yandex.ru> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1321906967 27666 80.91.229.12 (21 Nov 2011 20:22:47 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 21 Nov 2011 20:22:47 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Dmitry Antipov , emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Andreas Schwab Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Nov 21 21:22:43 2011 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([140.186.70.17]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1RSaO1-0000Cq-0S for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 21 Nov 2011 21:22:41 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:50476 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RSaO0-0000hS-HL for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 21 Nov 2011 15:22:40 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:50366) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RSaNx-0000fx-Bw for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 21 Nov 2011 15:22:38 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RSaNw-0002r5-HO for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 21 Nov 2011 15:22:37 -0500 Original-Received: from ironport2-out.teksavvy.com ([206.248.154.183]:19860) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RSaNw-0002qv-5q for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 21 Nov 2011 15:22:36 -0500 X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: Av0EAIGyyk5FxIAT/2dsb2JhbABDqjyBBoFyAQEEAVYjBQsLNBIUGA0kiBa0YYoXBIgalSSEVoRL X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.69,548,1315195200"; d="scan'208";a="148908800" Original-Received: from 69-196-128-19.dsl.teksavvy.com (HELO pastel.home) ([69.196.128.19]) by ironport2-out.teksavvy.com with ESMTP/TLS/ADH-AES256-SHA; 21 Nov 2011 15:22:34 -0500 Original-Received: by pastel.home (Postfix, from userid 20848) id 4733B58CB6; Mon, 21 Nov 2011 15:22:34 -0500 (EST) In-Reply-To: (Andreas Schwab's message of "Mon, 21 Nov 2011 17:55:37 +0100") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.0.91 (gnu/linux) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Genre and OS details not recognized. X-Received-From: 206.248.154.183 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:146116 Archived-At: > It's generally the duty of the caller to protect the object. No, Emacs's C code generally puts the burden on the callee rather than the caller (with a few exceptions like Ffuncall). Stefan