From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stefan Monnier Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: threads and kill-buffer Date: Thu, 06 Sep 2012 13:07:50 -0400 Message-ID: References: <87a9x55xvd.fsf@fleche.redhat.com> <5046D668.4010105@yandex.ru> <50471EEB.9030405@gmx.at> <837gs8e8n7.fsf@gnu.org> <50484E88.4080804@gmx.at> <83lignd1o8.fsf@gnu.org> <5048B623.9050802@gmx.at> <83ehmfciag.fsf@gnu.org> <5048C98A.4070303@gmx.at> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1346951293 3950 80.91.229.3 (6 Sep 2012 17:08:13 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 6 Sep 2012 17:08:13 +0000 (UTC) Cc: tromey@redhat.com, Eli Zaretskii , dmantipov@yandex.ru, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: martin rudalics Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Sep 06 19:08:14 2012 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1T9fYp-0002hK-PR for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 06 Sep 2012 19:08:11 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:53242 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1T9fYm-0001Qu-Jd for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 06 Sep 2012 13:08:08 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:47955) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1T9fYi-0001M0-U6 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 06 Sep 2012 13:08:05 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1T9fYe-0008N1-CO for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 06 Sep 2012 13:08:04 -0400 Original-Received: from ironport2-out.teksavvy.com ([206.248.154.182]:62012) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1T9fYW-0008Lx-RS; Thu, 06 Sep 2012 13:07:52 -0400 X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: Av0EAG6Zu09FpYew/2dsb2JhbABEtBGBCIIVAQEEAVYjEAs0EhQYDSSIHAW6CZBEA6MzgViDBQ X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.75,637,1330923600"; d="scan'208";a="197716507" Original-Received: from 69-165-135-176.dsl.teksavvy.com (HELO pastel.home) ([69.165.135.176]) by ironport2-out.teksavvy.com with ESMTP/TLS/ADH-AES256-SHA; 06 Sep 2012 13:07:51 -0400 Original-Received: by pastel.home (Postfix, from userid 20848) id 4245158B33; Thu, 6 Sep 2012 13:07:50 -0400 (EDT) In-Reply-To: <5048C98A.4070303@gmx.at> (martin rudalics's message of "Thu, 06 Sep 2012 18:04:26 +0200") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.2.50 (gnu/linux) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Genre and OS details not recognized. X-Received-From: 206.248.154.182 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:153119 Archived-At: >>> Would that be a different buffer from the *Backtrace* seen in A? >> Yes. > After trying to understand the internals of `debug' in the past days, > I'd be curious how this could be done. Why? When you killed the first *Backtrace* buffer, it lost its name, so when B pops a new backtrace, it creates a new *Backtrace* buffer. Stefan