From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stefan Monnier Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Is the Cygw32 port ready for testing? Date: Thu, 18 Oct 2012 18:04:38 -0400 Message-ID: References: <507B404C.8050602@cornell.edu> <507B4A96.6000804@dancol.org> <507B6404.8080103@cornell.edu> <507B68BD.2050409@dancol.org> <83pq4j4pwi.fsf@gnu.org> <507C64EF.5040209@cornell.edu> <507C659A.2020409@dancol.org> <507C8096.2090003@dancol.org> <507C8180.8010601@cornell.edu> <507C81EA.1000502@dancol.org> <507D5FD0.4060403@cornell.edu> <83zk3m2s31.fsf@gnu.org> <507FF5DE.1060307@cornell.edu> <83txtr1zcx.fsf@gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1350597885 17744 80.91.229.3 (18 Oct 2012 22:04:45 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 18 Oct 2012 22:04:45 +0000 (UTC) Cc: dancol@dancol.org, Ken Brown , emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Oct 19 00:04:52 2012 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1TOyCx-0006vm-4p for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 19 Oct 2012 00:04:51 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:42343 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TOyCq-0005mB-0W for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 18 Oct 2012 18:04:44 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:60345) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TOyCo-0005m6-FO for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 18 Oct 2012 18:04:43 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TOyCn-0006Jh-Lf for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 18 Oct 2012 18:04:42 -0400 Original-Received: from ironport2-out.teksavvy.com ([206.248.154.182]:50488) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TOyCm-0006JT-Dh; Thu, 18 Oct 2012 18:04:40 -0400 X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: Av0EAG6Zu09MCoeh/2dsb2JhbABEtBGBCIIVAQEEAVYjBQsLNBIUGA0kiBwFugmQRAOjM4FYgwU X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.75,637,1330923600"; d="scan'208";a="202116217" Original-Received: from 76-10-135-161.dsl.teksavvy.com (HELO pastel.home) ([76.10.135.161]) by ironport2-out.teksavvy.com with ESMTP/TLS/ADH-AES256-SHA; 18 Oct 2012 18:04:39 -0400 Original-Received: by pastel.home (Postfix, from userid 20848) id A773759525; Thu, 18 Oct 2012 18:04:38 -0400 (EDT) In-Reply-To: <83txtr1zcx.fsf@gnu.org> (Eli Zaretskii's message of "Thu, 18 Oct 2012 19:09:19 +0200") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.2.50 (gnu/linux) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Genre and OS details not recognized. X-Received-From: 206.248.154.182 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:154428 Archived-At: > This just means NSTATIC should be bumped up again (which Daniel > already did, I see). > I think going from 0x650 to 0x1000 is too much. But I'll let Stefan > decide. I'm not too worried about those 20KB, but yes, 0x800 sounds like a better choice. Stefan