From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stefan Monnier Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Modern Conventions for Emacs Lisp files? Date: Mon, 08 Apr 2013 22:11:06 -0400 Message-ID: References: <87hajhswdh.fsf@gmail.com> <8738v0fxw7.fsf@kuiper.lan.informatimago.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1365473473 18060 80.91.229.3 (9 Apr 2013 02:11:13 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 9 Apr 2013 02:11:13 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: "Pascal J. Bourguignon" Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Apr 09 04:11:17 2013 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1UPO1i-0004A1-Pl for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 09 Apr 2013 04:11:14 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:35033 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UPO1i-0006jI-7w for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 08 Apr 2013 22:11:14 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:57000) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UPO1e-0006jD-N5 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 08 Apr 2013 22:11:11 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UPO1c-00039n-AT for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 08 Apr 2013 22:11:10 -0400 Original-Received: from ironport2-out.teksavvy.com ([206.248.154.182]:38247) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UPO1c-00039i-5y for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 08 Apr 2013 22:11:08 -0400 X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AjcNABK/CFFFxLSu/2dsb2JhbABEukWDRwEDAQJ7F3OCHgEBBAFWIwULCzQSFBgNJIgeBsEtji6CXAOkeoFegmop X-IPAS-Result: AjcNABK/CFFFxLSu/2dsb2JhbABEukWDRwEDAQJ7F3OCHgEBBAFWIwULCzQSFBgNJIgeBsEtji6CXAOkeoFegmop X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.84,565,1355115600"; d="scan'208";a="6959309" Original-Received: from 69-196-180-174.dsl.teksavvy.com (HELO pastel.home) ([69.196.180.174]) by ironport2-out.teksavvy.com with ESMTP/TLS/ADH-AES256-SHA; 08 Apr 2013 22:11:04 -0400 Original-Received: by pastel.home (Postfix, from userid 20848) id D573267B9F; Mon, 8 Apr 2013 22:11:06 -0400 (EDT) In-Reply-To: <8738v0fxw7.fsf@kuiper.lan.informatimago.com> (Pascal J. Bourguignon's message of "Tue, 09 Apr 2013 00:41:44 +0200") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.3.50 (gnu/linux) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Genre and OS details not recognized. X-Received-From: 206.248.154.182 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:158790 Archived-At: > But the lisp convention is the opposite: Right, that's because Lisp didn't think it through. Luckily, we're only dealing with Elisp, Stefan