From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stefan Monnier Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Can we make set_point_both less expensive? Date: Tue, 17 Mar 2015 17:37:26 -0400 Message-ID: References: <5505E34C.4000106@dancol.org> <838uex1u1m.fsf@gnu.org> <8361a029p2.fsf@gnu.org> <83vbi0zukw.fsf@gnu.org> <55080104.9070606@gmx.at> <5508800E.3070600@gmx.at> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1426628279 24570 80.91.229.3 (17 Mar 2015 21:37:59 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 17 Mar 2015 21:37:59 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Eli Zaretskii , dancol@dancol.org, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: martin rudalics Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Mar 17 22:37:52 2015 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1YXzBO-0000iR-JU for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 17 Mar 2015 22:37:50 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:57176 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YXzBO-0002jF-1B for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 17 Mar 2015 17:37:50 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:34705) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YXzBA-0002j8-KE for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 17 Mar 2015 17:37:37 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YXzB7-0007b0-E3 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 17 Mar 2015 17:37:36 -0400 Original-Received: from chene.dit.umontreal.ca ([132.204.246.20]:58320) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YXzB7-0007aw-9O; Tue, 17 Mar 2015 17:37:33 -0400 Original-Received: from pastel.home (lechon.iro.umontreal.ca [132.204.27.242]) by chene.dit.umontreal.ca (8.14.1/8.14.1) with ESMTP id t2HLbQsh022456; Tue, 17 Mar 2015 17:37:26 -0400 Original-Received: by pastel.home (Postfix, from userid 20848) id 2B2E21F6E; Tue, 17 Mar 2015 17:37:26 -0400 (EDT) In-Reply-To: <5508800E.3070600@gmx.at> (martin rudalics's message of "Tue, 17 Mar 2015 20:27:10 +0100") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.0.50 (gnu/linux) X-NAI-Spam-Flag: NO X-NAI-Spam-Threshold: 5 X-NAI-Spam-Score: 0 X-NAI-Spam-Rules: 1 Rules triggered RV5248=0 X-NAI-Spam-Version: 2.3.0.9393 : core <5248> : inlines <2430> : streams <1407142> : uri <1883112> X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Genre and OS details not recognized. X-Received-From: 132.204.246.20 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:183973 Archived-At: >>> Couldn't pre-redisplay-hook move `point' off the window? >> Yes. Or it could delete the buffer and all my files. > Hmm... moving `point' off the window could be a side-effect of > fontifying. >>> Then redisplay would have to move `point' back to the window. >> Indeed. > And would run pre-redisplay-hook again. That's right. Stefan