From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Stefan Monnier Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Should mode commands be idempotent? Date: Tue, 19 Sep 2017 23:09:17 -0400 Message-ID: References: NNTP-Posting-Host: blaine.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: blaine.gmane.org 1505877008 15493 195.159.176.226 (20 Sep 2017 03:10:08 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 20 Sep 2017 03:10:08 +0000 (UTC) User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/26.0.50 (gnu/linux) To: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Sep 20 05:10:01 2017 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1duVOh-0003c9-Fd for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 20 Sep 2017 05:09:59 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:46402 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1duVOo-0004Zk-Mp for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 19 Sep 2017 23:10:06 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:35008) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1duVOE-0004ZW-Ma for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 19 Sep 2017 23:09:31 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1duVOB-00022x-IH for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 19 Sep 2017 23:09:30 -0400 Original-Received: from [195.159.176.226] (port=39510 helo=blaine.gmane.org) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1duVOB-0001z6-BD for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 19 Sep 2017 23:09:27 -0400 Original-Received: from list by blaine.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1duVNz-0001aU-Py for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 20 Sep 2017 05:09:15 +0200 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ Original-Lines: 11 Original-X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org Cancel-Lock: sha1:CHR1DkMYfJAkoDQ6H7DRgKxvE3A= X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] [fuzzy] X-Received-From: 195.159.176.226 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:218559 Archived-At: > Actually, I'm used to turning off minor modes by just calling their mode > function a second time... Of course, the well known and documented toggling behavior of minor modes is not what he was referring to. For a minor mode he was thinking of calling it twice with a positive arg or twice with a negative arg. Stefan