From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Stefan Monnier Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: while-no-input interrupted by *shell* Date: Mon, 24 Sep 2018 12:40:39 -0400 Message-ID: References: <87sh1y535s.fsf@web.de> <8336tyc1ou.fsf@gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: blaine.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: blaine.gmane.org 1537807230 15746 195.159.176.226 (24 Sep 2018 16:40:30 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 24 Sep 2018 16:40:30 +0000 (UTC) User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.0.50 (gnu/linux) To: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Sep 24 18:40:26 2018 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1g4TuL-000402-Vj for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 24 Sep 2018 18:40:26 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:46079 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1g4TwS-00036x-L9 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 24 Sep 2018 12:42:36 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:38841) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1g4TwH-00034y-0Q for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 24 Sep 2018 12:42:25 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1g4TwF-000062-SX for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 24 Sep 2018 12:42:24 -0400 Original-Received: from [195.159.176.226] (port=45708 helo=blaine.gmane.org) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1g4TwE-0008Ub-54 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 24 Sep 2018 12:42:23 -0400 Original-Received: from list by blaine.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1g4Tu1-0003dT-5c for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 24 Sep 2018 18:40:05 +0200 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ Original-Lines: 11 Original-X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org Cancel-Lock: sha1:m7hpR/cACgzzjqoXcrN52JTsjDs= X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 195.159.176.226 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:230025 Archived-At: >> (while-no-input (sit-for 100)) > Is it while-no-input that returns immediately, or is it sit-for? Oh, good point, I skipped the body of the while-no-input and hence didn't notice the sit-for. This said, the bulk of my answer isn't affected: sit-for shouldn't be interrupted by subprocess output either, I think. Stefan