From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stefan Monnier Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Native image rotation Date: Sun, 24 Feb 2019 15:08:25 -0500 Message-ID: References: <20190224113050.GA67303@breton.holly.idiocy.org> <83tvgtnoyh.fsf@gnu.org> <83o971nkjo.fsf@gnu.org> <83k1hpniqu.fsf@gnu.org> <838sy5ngok.fsf@gnu.org> <837edpng7p.fsf@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: blaine.gmane.org; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:195.159.176.226"; logging-data="104212"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@blaine.gmane.org" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.0.50 (gnu/linux) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sun Feb 24 21:09:07 2019 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1gy05D-000Qz8-MN for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 24 Feb 2019 21:09:07 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:55373 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gy05C-0006Xc-Hg for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 24 Feb 2019 15:09:06 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:54966) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gy057-0006Wg-4V for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 24 Feb 2019 15:09:01 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gy053-00010Y-V5 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 24 Feb 2019 15:08:59 -0500 Original-Received: from chene.dit.umontreal.ca ([132.204.246.20]:47346) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gy04v-0000ZG-2L; Sun, 24 Feb 2019 15:08:52 -0500 Original-Received: from pastel.home (lechon.iro.umontreal.ca [132.204.27.242]) by chene.dit.umontreal.ca (8.14.7/8.14.1) with ESMTP id x1OK8Pee009553; Sun, 24 Feb 2019 15:08:25 -0500 Original-Received: by pastel.home (Postfix, from userid 20848) id 227F16A17C; Sun, 24 Feb 2019 15:08:25 -0500 (EST) In-Reply-To: <837edpng7p.fsf@gnu.org> (Eli Zaretskii's message of "Sun, 24 Feb 2019 21:23:22 +0200") X-NAI-Spam-Flag: NO X-NAI-Spam-Threshold: 5 X-NAI-Spam-Score: 0 X-NAI-Spam-Rules: 2 Rules triggered EDT_SA_DN_PASS=0, RV6489=0 X-NAI-Spam-Version: 2.3.0.9418 : core <6489> : inlines <7020> : streams <1813994> : uri <2801705> X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Genre and OS details not recognized. X-Received-From: 132.204.246.20 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:233579 Archived-At: > Actually, I'm not sure I understand the question. What do you mean by > "cache does post-rotation"? I assume that the images go through various steps starting from the Elisp image descriptor and finishing with the final on-screen pixels being drawn. My question was if, along this "pipeline", Emacs's image cache is placed before or after the rotation operation. Stefan