From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stefan Monnier Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Getting ready to land native-compilation on master Date: Fri, 09 Apr 2021 18:43:59 -0400 Message-ID: References: <87a6q7xtz1.fsf@subst.net> <877dlbxp1j.fsf@subst.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="5448"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/28.0.50 (gnu/linux) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Jens C. Jensen Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Sat Apr 10 00:44:40 2021 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1lUzrk-0001Ik-1y for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Sat, 10 Apr 2021 00:44:40 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:43556 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lUzrj-0006nF-0Y for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Fri, 09 Apr 2021 18:44:39 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:57004) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lUzrC-0006OR-CI for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 09 Apr 2021 18:44:06 -0400 Original-Received: from mailscanner.iro.umontreal.ca ([132.204.25.50]:39815) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lUzr9-0005mF-RF for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 09 Apr 2021 18:44:05 -0400 Original-Received: from pmg2.iro.umontreal.ca (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by pmg2.iro.umontreal.ca (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 0F73380801; Fri, 9 Apr 2021 18:44:02 -0400 (EDT) Original-Received: from mail01.iro.umontreal.ca (unknown [172.31.2.1]) by pmg2.iro.umontreal.ca (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 666E5801AB; Fri, 9 Apr 2021 18:44:00 -0400 (EDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=iro.umontreal.ca; s=mail; t=1618008240; bh=NVsle0FoTOx/at6IzM6kwEqb1VH3cKYFOX9vtw9RLR4=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:References:Date:In-Reply-To:From; b=TYcYLkg3NUjNtjLx0Fa+vlCBN6evE+rD5XRD/+J6138dquOW+R22arkOaJpt5lhNR Y6rtOqiyo99PselCo1eSQpQQIFEjWvtpOW1i+mg0YOGoVQF1A9kqWmFJzvHnjWtpvf MJZEvnUZygsuSKIzmRVImTYzAEXQiepzv7mS2LZ3JUy0Y+4Mnyl8DZiRDQ/4QIP8nM WicaPTsMyo1rbmEWjzE8HXDY+QzDQ0pkdidq5qymuJwRyvXqARGTmLkF2FLUxuCj5s nUMv5kknvbjkiB3Mv4aj2e9+UNPSQGpDCmG2VRKPMx0RqwenFMESSXHogZKtgCXpDW MSDROh4oK/8gg== Original-Received: from alfajor (104-222-126-84.cpe.teksavvy.com [104.222.126.84]) by mail01.iro.umontreal.ca (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 3D1911203C4; Fri, 9 Apr 2021 18:44:00 -0400 (EDT) In-Reply-To: <877dlbxp1j.fsf@subst.net> (Jens C. Jensen's message of "Fri, 09 Apr 2021 20:59:04 +0200") Received-SPF: pass client-ip=132.204.25.50; envelope-from=monnier@iro.umontreal.ca; helo=mailscanner.iro.umontreal.ca X-Spam_score_int: -42 X-Spam_score: -4.3 X-Spam_bar: ---- X-Spam_report: (-4.3 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:267752 Archived-At: >> I'm curious: why would it affect syntax highlighting? > I'm using `highlight-defined', which adds faces to defined > variables/functions, I don't think it messes with any > built-in highlighting. Still: why does `subrp` affect it? Stefan