From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stefan Monnier Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Failed to verify signature archive-contents.sig: Date: Mon, 28 Feb 2022 08:19:31 -0500 Message-ID: References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="9140"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/29.0.50 (gnu/linux) To: Emacs Developers Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Mon Feb 28 14:23:33 2022 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1nOfzx-0002CJ-8z for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Mon, 28 Feb 2022 14:23:33 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:39954 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1nOfzw-0007wp-7a for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Mon, 28 Feb 2022 08:23:32 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:59068) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1nOfwD-000594-Tg for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 28 Feb 2022 08:19:43 -0500 Original-Received: from mailscanner.iro.umontreal.ca ([132.204.25.50]:10428) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1nOfwA-0006C8-BG for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 28 Feb 2022 08:19:40 -0500 Original-Received: from pmg3.iro.umontreal.ca (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pmg3.iro.umontreal.ca (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 55054440FCC; Mon, 28 Feb 2022 08:19:34 -0500 (EST) Original-Received: from mail01.iro.umontreal.ca (unknown [172.31.2.1]) by pmg3.iro.umontreal.ca (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 028ED440FC3; Mon, 28 Feb 2022 08:19:33 -0500 (EST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=iro.umontreal.ca; s=mail; t=1646054373; bh=87xZhr92SjLqxmnAi8SzvKUTb2Qbsor6iGFcE/7tXW4=; h=From:To:Subject:References:Date:In-Reply-To:From; b=Gi7ueyutIRtfb8KQzZC0bFOdB0Rvezp4ws3kMzKqc02uINZRJI1WLMEvrJvisGX5S Q9/93D6NdM7wYoSLiqLTWFmA2M6PsVk+bppo3PtK3qhKktbL3KFttqY0paw77SARVR A3HHbOZFaFaqu1O9uVnq+bLgt5jxqtYg0KwR0LIRYVQr/kAX8DZz5WBa1XeqeuaQu/ ZGIXAxhozGtI2mLJavrojSYpDwppHQnE4QJoX3wrwdXdfKoyKmt000R3j1e9JU7hPl PTZsmL+0SiGdV2eg/dmU9/sKMcJ1CW7wOr2KaMMVBbZrHtIZDg0k0PeUNeLgRYiSpg UzEgV3QwMWliA== Original-Received: from pastel (unknown [45.72.208.76]) by mail01.iro.umontreal.ca (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id D81DC120510; Mon, 28 Feb 2022 08:19:32 -0500 (EST) In-Reply-To: (Jean Louis's message of "Mon, 28 Feb 2022 14:43:03 +0300") Received-SPF: pass client-ip=132.204.25.50; envelope-from=monnier@iro.umontreal.ca; helo=mailscanner.iro.umontreal.ca X-Spam_score_int: -42 X-Spam_score: -4.3 X-Spam_bar: ---- X-Spam_report: (-4.3 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:286724 Archived-At: Jean Louis [2022-02-28 14:43:03] wrote: > * Stefan Monnier [2022-02-26 23:36]: >> Jean Louis [2022-02-26 16:19:24] wrote: >> > Failed to verify signature archive-contents.sig: >> > Bad signature from 066DAFCB81E42C40 GNU ELPA Signing Agent (2019) >> > Command output: >> > gpg: Signature made Fri 25 Feb 2022 01:05:04 AM EAT >> > gpg: using RSA key C433554766D3DDC64221BFAA066DAFCB81E42C40 >> > gpg: BAD signature from "GNU ELPA Signing Agent (2019) " [unknown] >> > >> > after M-x package-list-packages >> Do you still see that? > I don't see it, it was surprising. I *should* be surprising, indeed! > Maybe it is my unreliable Internet connection. I think this is very unlikely to be the reason. Stefan