From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stefan Monnier Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: master 91418d27e9: Add new functions for computing character metrics for windows Date: Sat, 30 Apr 2022 09:33:58 -0400 Message-ID: References: <165123811050.20687.5215165731843845332@vcs2.savannah.gnu.org> <20220429131511.9BD62C01683@vcs2.savannah.gnu.org> <87v8usc7wz.fsf@gnus.org> <83czgzacfk.fsf@gnu.org> <87ilqq4yfc.fsf@gnus.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="18315"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/29.0.50 (gnu/linux) Cc: Eli Zaretskii , malsburg@posteo.de, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Lars Ingebrigtsen Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Sat Apr 30 16:06:29 2022 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1nknjw-0004WS-O7 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Sat, 30 Apr 2022 16:06:28 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:43836 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1nknjv-0007hc-Dm for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Sat, 30 Apr 2022 10:06:27 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:57052) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1nknEf-0005Sm-WE for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 30 Apr 2022 09:34:10 -0400 Original-Received: from mailscanner.iro.umontreal.ca ([132.204.25.50]:39762) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1nknEd-0006xf-3w; Sat, 30 Apr 2022 09:34:08 -0400 Original-Received: from pmg3.iro.umontreal.ca (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pmg3.iro.umontreal.ca (Proxmox) with ESMTP id ECBCE440AB3; Sat, 30 Apr 2022 09:34:04 -0400 (EDT) Original-Received: from mail01.iro.umontreal.ca (unknown [172.31.2.1]) by pmg3.iro.umontreal.ca (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 7E53E440A2A; Sat, 30 Apr 2022 09:33:59 -0400 (EDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=iro.umontreal.ca; s=mail; t=1651325639; bh=C4m0KQDxPQh8B0JK/Go8uMcHGz+Fj4qVv/SY9c4O2WA=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:References:Date:In-Reply-To:From; b=mRqTM3H3+2spex3MCAiqECFUukm7XrpK8AAkMnx3ExZOjEVVHkITST7CRncZ9gnXF Lu/6rE8ezSxu9ia2EoJNl3fIhxf92Yjaf8vXuXKZOuU2zqTSzZVlKR8nR9vSCaFC/Y erl0DZbsTwN/EjturTtB+xqudFbM/P2BXJXxSZ5puZVavCUPiJhge4nL9uHbDytZG5 CYZzKiecbA1eaPKi7oTSFZhgpc0+bUwVQt89oCJJRxlE4VnHUtNtSlqEGqQOAH/yIR 5Ut5TnucP3Gnj28UlsVi0HnPw9hDjKRuVlb9IiFAlqOQgstb60YrUQS4p0jzI8LLgX hNlIJwsPA/JRw== Original-Received: from alfajor (modemcable034.207-20-96.mc.videotron.ca [96.20.207.34]) by mail01.iro.umontreal.ca (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 56CAA120396; Sat, 30 Apr 2022 09:33:59 -0400 (EDT) In-Reply-To: <87ilqq4yfc.fsf@gnus.org> (Lars Ingebrigtsen's message of "Sat, 30 Apr 2022 13:12:55 +0200") Received-SPF: pass client-ip=132.204.25.50; envelope-from=monnier@iro.umontreal.ca; helo=mailscanner.iro.umontreal.ca X-Spam_score_int: -42 X-Spam_score: -4.3 X-Spam_bar: ---- X-Spam_report: (-4.3 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:289055 Archived-At: Lars Ingebrigtsen [2022-04-30 13:12:55] wrote: > Stefan Monnier writes: >> BTW, I notice that `window-max-characters-per-line` doesn't deduct the >> space used by `display-line-number-mode`, whereas I'd expect most(?) >> users of that function to want to take this into account. > We could add that, but display-line-number-mode is per buffer, while > this is a window function, so it doesn't quite seem natural. I know. And it's worse because that width can vary over time. But admittedly, in most cases you can use `window-max-characters-per-line only` as a heuristic because of the effect of proportional fonts, compositions, and faces applied to specific parts of the text. Stefan