From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stefan Monnier Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Naming guidelines for ELPA packages Date: Sun, 14 May 2023 19:00:55 -0400 Message-ID: References: <87ttwjbfqq.fsf@gmail.com> <83y1lv5qe9.fsf@gnu.org> <0c04d76f-cca9-8a33-14fe-b9ad96a2b9aa@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="1630"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org, Susam Pal To: Jim Porter Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Mon May 15 01:01:45 2023 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1pyKim-0000D5-Do for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Mon, 15 May 2023 01:01:44 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1pyKi7-0003gh-Nt; Sun, 14 May 2023 19:01:03 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1pyKi5-0003en-6k for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 14 May 2023 19:01:01 -0400 Original-Received: from mailscanner.iro.umontreal.ca ([132.204.25.50]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1pyKi3-000146-Ik for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 14 May 2023 19:01:00 -0400 Original-Received: from pmg1.iro.umontreal.ca (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by pmg1.iro.umontreal.ca (Proxmox) with ESMTP id AA55B100068; Sun, 14 May 2023 19:00:57 -0400 (EDT) Original-Received: from mail01.iro.umontreal.ca (unknown [172.31.2.1]) by pmg1.iro.umontreal.ca (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 3CDC71000E7; Sun, 14 May 2023 19:00:56 -0400 (EDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=iro.umontreal.ca; s=mail; t=1684105256; bh=qeO+luax0Ym+W9NyF+8M2H/ZSRzEwqqWdeTCzuFl2+Y=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:Date:From; b=ANSpYlzHUAtdXQl0ouAaZXmVLjPTjVlw4GqzX6q9gQ2/X0biVB/GMqO04L+MgPuk+ BhgfGiqlEKDKNsJaTMWzYrc5PYtTBVe8y6myTQnt8JZU3fRG18VgDJP4v1Q4NZsfji eHFk2an8ryG2u+oUCmwlnv+Dqc+dp1LFNjGWiAibB05HSKVV9ANtm3kKn04I84MmaD ZF9SQ15OFSD31xMdF+U22eDRK7bFFwwhe02kDDaPqnXFScU6R4fpUBumM7nhCsx4Mn AjDX8jC22/ybUKOioYGs2GQgFqnK9ZXldaPEWqc6sxJ+pZn6hkivjjNTla6/mns6vy 17q/we5JvWaRg== Original-Received: from pastel (unknown [45.72.217.176]) by mail01.iro.umontreal.ca (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id E2FC01209A3; Sun, 14 May 2023 19:00:55 -0400 (EDT) In-Reply-To: (Jim Porter's message of "Sun, 14 May 2023 15:17:39 -0700") Received-SPF: pass client-ip=132.204.25.50; envelope-from=monnier@iro.umontreal.ca; helo=mailscanner.iro.umontreal.ca X-Spam_score_int: -42 X-Spam_score: -4.3 X-Spam_bar: ---- X-Spam_report: (-4.3 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:306124 Archived-At: > I agree. This is mainly an attempt to help package maintainers pick good (or > "good enough") names on their own so that there's less time spent discussing > this issue, and also to be upfront about what the Emacs/ELPA maintainers > would prefer. That way, as a package maintainer, you can take these > guidelines into account (or not) before you even submit the package. Great. Is there still something that needs to be resolved before we can add this package to NonGNU ELPA, then? [ BTW, I wish this went into GNU ELPA, instead. Oh, and it should have a `.gitignore` along the lines of what I put in the appended patch. ] Stefan diff --git a/.gitignore b/.gitignore new file mode 100644 index 0000000000..af7e30dd09 --- /dev/null +++ b/.gitignore @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +/devil-autoloads.el +/devil-pkg.el +*.elc