From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stefan Monnier Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: max-lisp-eval-depth safe upper bounds ? Date: Wed, 09 Apr 2008 11:28:23 -0400 Message-ID: References: <20080408213044.597adc70@reforged> <47FCD5A5.9010508@gmail.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1207754976 27925 80.91.229.12 (9 Apr 2008 15:29:36 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 9 Apr 2008 15:29:36 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Andreas Schwab , emacs developers , Mike Mattie To: "Lennart Borgman \(gmail\)" Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Apr 09 17:29:59 2008 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1JjcEb-0004rm-2L for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 09 Apr 2008 17:29:13 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1JjcDx-0005Gp-J2 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 09 Apr 2008 11:28:33 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1JjcDs-0005Fq-KP for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 09 Apr 2008 11:28:28 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1JjcDp-0005DA-9T for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 09 Apr 2008 11:28:27 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1JjcDp-0005D5-3z for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 09 Apr 2008 11:28:25 -0400 Original-Received: from ironport2-out.pppoe.ca ([206.248.154.182] helo=ironport2-out.teksavvy.com) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1JjcDo-0005nx-9n for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 09 Apr 2008 11:28:24 -0400 X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AgoFAAp9/EfO+KV8/2dsb2JhbACBXKsW X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.25,630,1199682000"; d="scan'208";a="18214809" Original-Received: from smtp.pppoe.ca (HELO smtp.teksavvy.com) ([65.39.196.238]) by ironport2-out.teksavvy.com with ESMTP; 09 Apr 2008 11:28:23 -0400 Original-Received: from pastel.home ([206.248.165.124]) by smtp.teksavvy.com (Internet Mail Server v1.0) with ESMTP id PTL40023; Wed, 09 Apr 2008 11:28:23 -0400 Original-Received: by pastel.home (Postfix, from userid 20848) id 375A58958; Wed, 9 Apr 2008 11:28:23 -0400 (EDT) In-Reply-To: <47FCD5A5.9010508@gmail.com> (Lennart Borgman's message of "Wed, 09 Apr 2008 16:41:41 +0200") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.0.60 (gnu/linux) X-detected-kernel: by monty-python.gnu.org: Genre and OS details not recognized. X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:94796 Archived-At: >>> What is the safe upper limit for this variable ? >> It depends on the stack limit and the architecture. > But is there same way to get this limit from inside Emacs? Not that I know. Stefan