From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stefan Monnier Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel,gmane.emacs.cedet Subject: CEDET completion-at-point-function Date: Sun, 11 May 2014 14:24:07 -0400 Message-ID: NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1399832674 10356 80.91.229.3 (11 May 2014 18:24:34 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 11 May 2014 18:24:34 +0000 (UTC) Cc: zappo@gnu.org, dgutov@gnu.org, deng@randomsample.de, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: cedet-devel@lists.sourceforge.net Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sun May 11 20:24:27 2014 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1WjYQF-00061a-0b for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 11 May 2014 20:24:27 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:33950 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WjYQE-00051V-JH for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 11 May 2014 14:24:26 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:56955) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WjYQ5-000519-2k for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 11 May 2014 14:24:24 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WjYPx-0007h8-JR for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 11 May 2014 14:24:17 -0400 Original-Received: from ironport2-out.teksavvy.com ([206.248.154.181]:14742) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WjYPx-0007h0-FO; Sun, 11 May 2014 14:24:09 -0400 X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AvAGAIDvNVNMCqwB/2dsb2JhbABZgwYBg0m5A4c6gRcXdIMCI08mGA2IMNIZF456HYQiBKkZgWqDTCE X-IPAS-Result: AvAGAIDvNVNMCqwB/2dsb2JhbABZgwYBg0m5A4c6gRcXdIMCI08mGA2IMNIZF456HYQiBKkZgWqDTCE X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.97,753,1389762000"; d="scan'208";a="62355847" Original-Received: from 76-10-172-1.dsl.teksavvy.com (HELO pastel.home) ([76.10.172.1]) by ironport2-out.teksavvy.com with ESMTP/TLS/ADH-AES256-SHA; 11 May 2014 14:24:07 -0400 Original-Received: by pastel.home (Postfix, from userid 20848) id 147C8602A0; Sun, 11 May 2014 14:24:07 -0400 (EDT) User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.4.50 (gnu/linux) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Genre and OS details not recognized. X-Received-From: 206.248.154.181 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:171804 gmane.emacs.cedet:6822 Archived-At: I've taken a look at improving semantic.el's completion-at-point-function, and I'm wondering: Can we use lexical-binding in there (completion-at-point-functions was designed assuming closures are not a problem), or would it be a problem for compatibility reasons? Stefan