From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Stefan Monnier Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Split `simple.el'? Date: Wed, 04 Apr 2018 09:14:43 -0400 Message-ID: References: <5f1e960c-483f-4902-b4c2-b7a4ca3b04f4@default> <10c96362-297f-db97-d4a9-da3d66d4dd34@cs.ucla.edu> <83in974gwf.fsf@gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: blaine.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: blaine.gmane.org 1522847734 17802 195.159.176.226 (4 Apr 2018 13:15:34 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 4 Apr 2018 13:15:34 +0000 (UTC) User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.0.50 (gnu/linux) Cc: Paul Eggert , emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Apr 04 15:15:29 2018 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1f3iG9-0004XA-M6 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 04 Apr 2018 15:15:29 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:57717 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1f3iIF-0000D2-5h for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 04 Apr 2018 09:17:39 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:60037) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1f3iFa-0006p1-7I for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 04 Apr 2018 09:14:55 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1f3iFW-0007SF-53 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 04 Apr 2018 09:14:54 -0400 Original-Received: from pruche.dit.umontreal.ca ([132.204.246.22]:34971) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1f3iFV-0007Rt-Vw; Wed, 04 Apr 2018 09:14:50 -0400 Original-Received: from ceviche.home (lechon.iro.umontreal.ca [132.204.27.242]) by pruche.dit.umontreal.ca (8.14.7/8.14.1) with ESMTP id w34DEhP1012702; Wed, 4 Apr 2018 09:14:44 -0400 Original-Received: by ceviche.home (Postfix, from userid 20848) id 4F8906637D; Wed, 4 Apr 2018 09:14:43 -0400 (EDT) In-Reply-To: <83in974gwf.fsf@gnu.org> (Eli Zaretskii's message of "Wed, 04 Apr 2018 09:36:32 +0300") X-NAI-Spam-Flag: NO X-NAI-Spam-Threshold: 5 X-NAI-Spam-Score: 0 X-NAI-Spam-Rules: 2 Rules triggered EDT_SA_DN_PASS=0, RV6257=0 X-NAI-Spam-Version: 2.3.0.9418 : core <6257> : inlines <6541> : streams <1783175> : uri <2620327> X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Genre and OS details not recognized. X-Received-From: 132.204.246.22 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:224318 Archived-At: > I don't think there's a display bug. Drew has a very large number of > fonts installed, so searching for a font that supports some character > can take a long time, if none of them support that character. > > IOW, it's a system configuration bug: with such a large number of > fonts, one should have at least one font that covers each Unicode > codepoint, and one might need to customize their fontsets to find the > fonts more quickly. Maybe we should setup some cache to avoid always recomputing this. Stefan