From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Stefan Monnier Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: [Feature Discuss] Nested buffer Date: Tue, 24 Jul 2018 22:31:15 -0400 Message-ID: References: <87pnzdt87e.fsf@telefonica.net> NNTP-Posting-Host: blaine.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: blaine.gmane.org 1532485882 29981 195.159.176.226 (25 Jul 2018 02:31:22 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 25 Jul 2018 02:31:22 +0000 (UTC) User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.0.50 (gnu/linux) To: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Jul 25 04:31:18 2018 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1fi9aA-0007hB-Dk for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 25 Jul 2018 04:31:18 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:43386 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1fi9cH-0001Pv-60 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 24 Jul 2018 22:33:29 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:41102) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1fi9bH-0001NW-QD for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 24 Jul 2018 22:32:32 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1fi9bD-0002ZZ-EU for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 24 Jul 2018 22:32:27 -0400 Original-Received: from [195.159.176.226] (port=60144 helo=blaine.gmane.org) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1fi9bB-0002Z5-7E for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 24 Jul 2018 22:32:21 -0400 Original-Received: from list by blaine.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1fi9Yy-0006UB-21 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 25 Jul 2018 04:30:04 +0200 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ Original-Lines: 11 Original-X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org Cancel-Lock: sha1:e0452jCpH+AXjI/uoURYp0rHKA4= X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] [fuzzy] X-Received-From: 195.159.176.226 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:227789 Archived-At: > In my case, often I have to work on some feature that touches certain > areas of several source files and, at the same time, create and edit > several test cases, each on one file. Having everything on the same > buffer will save lots of buffer switching, while at the same time > providing a compact "work area" that eases reading and editing. BTW, this sounds like a problem that could be solved also with something like Phil Lord's `lentic`. Stefan