From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stefan Monnier Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Towards a cleaner build Date: Sun, 09 Jun 2019 18:57:49 -0400 Message-ID: References: <83zhn6zkgf.fsf@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: blaine.gmane.org; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:195.159.176.226"; logging-data="102293"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@blaine.gmane.org" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.0.50 (gnu/linux) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Lars Ingebrigtsen Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Jun 10 00:58:01 2019 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1ha6lE-000QRF-JY for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 10 Jun 2019 00:58:01 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:38900 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.86_2) (envelope-from ) id 1ha6lD-0003Zu-Ku for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 09 Jun 2019 18:57:59 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:45442) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.86_2) (envelope-from ) id 1ha6l9-0003Zm-Fc for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 09 Jun 2019 18:57:56 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ha6l8-0006fj-JU for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 09 Jun 2019 18:57:55 -0400 Original-Received: from mailscanner.iro.umontreal.ca ([132.204.25.50]:33315) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ha6l8-0006fH-DQ for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 09 Jun 2019 18:57:54 -0400 Original-Received: from pmg2.iro.umontreal.ca (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by pmg2.iro.umontreal.ca (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 6BBB4810A2; Sun, 9 Jun 2019 18:57:53 -0400 (EDT) Original-Received: from mail01.iro.umontreal.ca (unknown [172.31.2.1]) by pmg2.iro.umontreal.ca (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 04C4180E0D; Sun, 9 Jun 2019 18:57:52 -0400 (EDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=iro.umontreal.ca; s=mail; t=1560121072; bh=t0RkMBdYFbKI2KijU9bVwumqhANNiC5+M6XR9dxQwAk=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:References:Date:In-Reply-To:From; b=V+VjKh9M5py3PiG4z8va83KIzYz1U9WCHToCkwszlg40VA5RbHiefk3Ghoqi3z8Lu LZL0hZAkgXQ/Z7E7+QFu6Xrtzk6hkl0irMC2cME2kGz8aSpByt13OMNnCXkWg3t218 Wi/+8/j0R48BpntL7xY+f7/IzEFCtfmWHvbtbvUdSzF9wpHK4a80qSdl57LldmVo56 cpoUxRnkW7JiJAoC9PTQNbwE0OTZG8FgFjNDzvjwUKRwVYlYi579u7H2c/3JUa66n7 RWQPtdfUfG3F0WebGV9TlRdgc9b2zBq76bk2ZjtdnC4/QlmGvbKjntygrAf7Ym+q6I 5q7EPjqVkS+hQ== Original-Received: from alfajor (unknown [216.154.16.220]) by mail01.iro.umontreal.ca (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id C12A9120C73; Sun, 9 Jun 2019 18:57:51 -0400 (EDT) In-Reply-To: (Lars Ingebrigtsen's message of "Sun, 09 Jun 2019 21:08:23 +0200") X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 132.204.25.50 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:237369 Archived-At: >> Hmm... I've never seen this warning misfire nor have I ever been unable >> to replace the mapcar with mapc, so I'm not sure we care about this case >> w.r.t with-suppressed-warnings. > > No, these aren't very useful suppressions, but since they can be > silenced individually by setting byte-compile-warnings, I think it makes > sense to also allow with-suppressed-warnings to do the same. Interface > regularity is nice. I see no reason not to support them, indeed, but I just mean that there's no point trying to spend any effort trying to fine-tune the behavior in this case. Stefan