From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stefan Monnier Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: highlight-indent-guides in display engine Date: Mon, 15 Jul 2019 08:58:00 -0400 Message-ID: References: <83zhlk2xiu.fsf@gnu.org> <20190712002127.6tm3scplu73syinp@Ergus> <83tvbr3fl7.fsf@gnu.org> <20190712095841.qn5rlgxxgqjllz4k@Ergus> <83h87r2wpk.fsf@gnu.org> <20190712185100.omyyovxh5hqzpk5z@Ergus> <83v9w61ktg.fsf@gnu.org> <878st249o1.fsf@fastmail.fm> <83ims61g80.fsf@gnu.org> <87o91xfwfo.fsf@fastmail.fm> <20190714125618.wlmansy26d6nstmy@Ergus> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: blaine.gmane.org; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:195.159.176.226"; logging-data="228313"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@blaine.gmane.org" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.0.50 (gnu/linux) Cc: Joost Kremers , emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Ergus Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Jul 15 14:58:11 2019 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1hn0YT-000xCF-Id for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 15 Jul 2019 14:58:09 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:38266 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.86_2) (envelope-from ) id 1hn0YS-0007BF-6p for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 15 Jul 2019 08:58:08 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:41862) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.86_2) (envelope-from ) id 1hn0YP-00075z-9I for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 15 Jul 2019 08:58:06 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hn0YO-0005jU-DI for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 15 Jul 2019 08:58:05 -0400 Original-Received: from mailscanner.iro.umontreal.ca ([132.204.25.50]:6252) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hn0YO-0005ix-83 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 15 Jul 2019 08:58:04 -0400 Original-Received: from pmg3.iro.umontreal.ca (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pmg3.iro.umontreal.ca (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 23FD7444CEB; Mon, 15 Jul 2019 08:58:03 -0400 (EDT) Original-Received: from mail01.iro.umontreal.ca (unknown [172.31.2.1]) by pmg3.iro.umontreal.ca (Proxmox) with ESMTP id EEF62444CE6; Mon, 15 Jul 2019 08:58:01 -0400 (EDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=iro.umontreal.ca; s=mail; t=1563195482; bh=9f7VS01vMxhr17yIN0oJ4Ld3tFPeBuj2Sy50e7ziGlc=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:References:Date:In-Reply-To:From; b=Z0m69GghIgs8PZzJcMmdiEKZb6gEO0yoApQNyYlU32IHk3/7stWH6S446p89k+uLR wIjCWie6lVX8THA52ErPsi+w04M0n2IS1mlv8SYrZmRgZEg7ckLWeBU2IaRZUMX23l IPQoUkc2pLcarmqGk3LDIiEWkV9ThCYG1j28LCaJBXG6uzXI+n/1cKXfEYOf5mRB8v CwEihYLQN3JRDxSK9zMo5QI2qsLfG3/hxU1n8Cb7xLbhj6Dj2j4pzKnDQR9VH2ghYi BwVulIWIn1TQDkxG1EtN7fETD6svXc3LdrPBFEyCm00zuSC/Q0tpWAXLRTIKLS8zOC dN1V6/u76zr4g== Original-Received: from pastel (104-222-123-229.cpe.teksavvy.com [104.222.123.229]) by mail01.iro.umontreal.ca (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 239811203B6; Mon, 15 Jul 2019 08:58:01 -0400 (EDT) In-Reply-To: <20190714125618.wlmansy26d6nstmy@Ergus> (Ergus's message of "Sun, 14 Jul 2019 14:56:18 +0200") X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 132.204.25.50 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:238589 Archived-At: > But with this minimal support at least there will be something "good > enough" for C and all the derived from cc-mode (Java, C++, Ruby, Perl, > Lua) plus Python, Latex, Makefiles, Bash, Tcl, SQL, Assembly, Rust. So, > many users will be benefited... I think it is still a good deal right?. I'm not sure I understand the problem that makes it work for those modes but not for Lisp. E.g. in C mode by default we get indentation of this form: int main () { sfgasfgasfg(tot(x + 3), y); } How is this fundamentally different from what happens in Lisp? Stefan