From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.ciao.gmane.io!not-for-mail From: Stefan Monnier Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Imports / inclusion of s.el into Emacs Date: Wed, 06 May 2020 23:14:52 -0400 Message-ID: References: <0c88192c-3c33-46ed-95cb-b4c6928016e3@default> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="ciao.gmane.io:159.69.161.202"; logging-data="79219"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/28.0.50 (gnu/linux) Cc: stefan@marxist.se, emacs-devel@gnu.org, joaotavora@gmail.com, pcr910303@icloud.com, dgutov@yandex.ru, eliz@gnu.org, drew.adams@oracle.com To: Richard Stallman Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Thu May 07 05:16:10 2020 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1jWX18-000KWe-43 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Thu, 07 May 2020 05:16:10 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:57896 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jWX17-00022m-7M for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Wed, 06 May 2020 23:16:09 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:39756) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jWX05-00015R-LT for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 06 May 2020 23:15:05 -0400 Original-Received: from mailscanner.iro.umontreal.ca ([132.204.25.50]:43758) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jWX04-0004R7-Kz; Wed, 06 May 2020 23:15:05 -0400 Original-Received: from pmg1.iro.umontreal.ca (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by pmg1.iro.umontreal.ca (Proxmox) with ESMTP id E3EE6100F93; Wed, 6 May 2020 23:15:02 -0400 (EDT) Original-Received: from mail01.iro.umontreal.ca (unknown [172.31.2.1]) by pmg1.iro.umontreal.ca (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 4F99F100F54; Wed, 6 May 2020 23:14:54 -0400 (EDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=iro.umontreal.ca; s=mail; t=1588821294; bh=N5O86v0sXLD2K46/jPQwwa0ei+NtA3sYf5y0Z36XwWw=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:References:Date:In-Reply-To:From; b=LuGX+7dauyNlhIKfqO57xcBMzdMu+rcHCOvpS/hPL5x/ZRnhnftZQcBnaVfFOESbN 8QVKDEmG64KK03UbKSHyDk5oDBsIkfBNsK1enriz8koaUH283P4IwaGs1IYJbGK/8k ptlQUZAgncYN0zC5nx0SSdS3J5ApLLPNBhiRCu6/VDErQF+BNDlzW8vyHUWv01qiwk AY6dPtes3Xx5cQtAANRBJiknbGfRLxobC0O7vpD2iEXRlGnkcqocO6BjLpWrtDKk10 OJ604JOQ1NgXdtAmWh6H0V/wNHFoIAt2Jz1BLxfmS81TWMaS8tZEx/cgRsbb0WrPAC 6ImL3Xneb7yyA== Original-Received: from alfajor (unknown [216.154.3.202]) by mail01.iro.umontreal.ca (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 7236F120235; Wed, 6 May 2020 23:14:53 -0400 (EDT) In-Reply-To: (Richard Stallman's message of "Wed, 06 May 2020 22:44:44 -0400") Received-SPF: pass client-ip=132.204.25.50; envelope-from=monnier@iro.umontreal.ca; helo=mailscanner.iro.umontreal.ca X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: First seen = 2020/05/06 23:12:36 X-ACL-Warn: Detected OS = Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Spam_score_int: -42 X-Spam_score: -4.3 X-Spam_bar: ---- X-Spam_report: (-4.3 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001 autolearn=_AUTOLEARN X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:249144 Archived-At: > See my message to Stefan for a change that would make s.sl ok to add. There's no change under discussion: either it's in GNU ELPA or it's not (in which case it will keep living happily ever after in MELPA). > > I'm not sure why there's this sudden turnaround on this issue, maybe > > I'm missing something. > I don't think there was a turnaround. We never decided to include > s.el in GNU ELPA. Yes, I did. Stefan