From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stefan Monnier Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Kmail: Gmail (less secure apps) advice for GNU emacs developers. Date: Tue, 11 Aug 2020 14:53:53 -0400 Message-ID: References: <87o8njdlvs.fsf@mat.ucm.es> <1897936.H7q943mS67@merkaba> <5532801.MhkbZ0Pkbq@twilight> <87zh728oco.fsf@mat.ucm.es> <87tux93v71.fsf@mat.ucm.es> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="8173"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/28.0.50 (gnu/linux) To: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Tue Aug 11 20:55:27 2020 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1k5ZQk-00020q-LB for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Tue, 11 Aug 2020 20:55:26 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:40700 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1k5ZQj-0001OT-Ng for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Tue, 11 Aug 2020 14:55:25 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:44566) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1k5ZPM-0000Cl-2w for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 11 Aug 2020 14:54:00 -0400 Original-Received: from mailscanner.iro.umontreal.ca ([132.204.25.50]:27916) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1k5ZPJ-0001PC-Sv for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 11 Aug 2020 14:53:59 -0400 Original-Received: from pmg2.iro.umontreal.ca (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by pmg2.iro.umontreal.ca (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 9814180A93; Tue, 11 Aug 2020 14:53:56 -0400 (EDT) Original-Received: from mail01.iro.umontreal.ca (unknown [172.31.2.1]) by pmg2.iro.umontreal.ca (Proxmox) with ESMTP id EB2C8806B9; Tue, 11 Aug 2020 14:53:54 -0400 (EDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=iro.umontreal.ca; s=mail; t=1597172034; bh=Qtx1CnGCvEPjBMAMNxYZdNRf1ta52JLMCSRoqOPY6kA=; h=From:To:Subject:References:Date:In-Reply-To:From; b=HwCdNWQ6OskSK32d2mGIlCamGQBCevWDv7u2Vh39/e2lP+J5lc6FtC8Ewau9stnjV ZG8JMI6tRHznYoASDyvfYTPqBT0MBjz0XzNN39BeUQ4bl9ln4LyE15ENkw1SiSfDnN d3GvyhzYNImrdxFAB7N83OD01oy3gOW3IsGAk4bEazXCAS/I4Zz4W+Nzd4CAdRQS8c 1/fyZXoLfP9N5SDLZ3/jSnEWcr6NFdfP5N1Ni16QgBqWpANwNrgHNN1IiS/7dT/gz6 pzFVQ15NWcCElf08HCJg+1Jt6NjStVVo2hyBkxuOIgTIysLbAZX7Vc1O3FWz0BfVyt t1yBU088sRzUw== Original-Received: from milanesa (unknown [45.72.246.108]) by mail01.iro.umontreal.ca (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id C6D571202E9; Tue, 11 Aug 2020 14:53:54 -0400 (EDT) In-Reply-To: <87tux93v71.fsf@mat.ucm.es> (Uwe Brauer's message of "Tue, 11 Aug 2020 20:15:46 +0200") Received-SPF: pass client-ip=132.204.25.50; envelope-from=monnier@iro.umontreal.ca; helo=mailscanner.iro.umontreal.ca X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: First seen = 2020/08/11 14:53:56 X-ACL-Warn: Detected OS = Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Spam_score_int: -42 X-Spam_score: -4.3 X-Spam_bar: ---- X-Spam_report: (-4.3 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:253646 Archived-At: > > FWIW, this has been discussed at my workplace as well, tho luckily it > > hasn't happened (yet?). At that time, I had considered what I'd do, and > > I concluded that I'd most likely setup a forwarding on my (gmail) work > > email and buy a more respectable email service like `posteo.de`. > > Oh no, I might try out dovecot, but even if it works, it will occupy > a huge amount of my disk. Not sure what you're saying, but I'm only suggesting to use some other provider instead of Google. No need to install&manage anything like dovecot. Stefan