From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stefan Monnier Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: [ELPA] New package: ob-haxe Date: Mon, 18 Jan 2021 11:32:46 -0500 Message-ID: References: <878s8qu5cv.fsf@Otto.invalid> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="5324"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/28.0.50 (gnu/linux) Cc: ian martins , emacs-devel@gnu.org To: ASSI Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Mon Jan 18 18:09:51 2021 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1l1Y2G-0001FV-Jg for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Mon, 18 Jan 2021 18:09:48 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:54542 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1l1Y2F-0003WI-IL for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Mon, 18 Jan 2021 12:09:47 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:35556) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1l1XSV-0002yy-Oj for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 18 Jan 2021 11:32:51 -0500 Original-Received: from mailscanner.iro.umontreal.ca ([132.204.25.50]:4140) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1l1XSU-0001fd-5P for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 18 Jan 2021 11:32:51 -0500 Original-Received: from pmg1.iro.umontreal.ca (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by pmg1.iro.umontreal.ca (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 4C2E7102398; Mon, 18 Jan 2021 11:32:49 -0500 (EST) Original-Received: from mail01.iro.umontreal.ca (unknown [172.31.2.1]) by pmg1.iro.umontreal.ca (Proxmox) with ESMTP id DB601101C8F; Mon, 18 Jan 2021 11:32:47 -0500 (EST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=iro.umontreal.ca; s=mail; t=1610987567; bh=f94zdPddIqcCFTx8ag0uNPbNepgkcGtuSFE41xE6ZBk=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:References:Date:In-Reply-To:From; b=huiJ1qgxh1EfDuhgPoHVxc3Ztj7snIPpSejqETNE1YXw40TonGfdNZ5qrVZSh6WCf /pHMLIKtoSXcTD8LB1Tgh+R33qTpbonRAFnHU/IAio1+NKjXYJPjr07cask2sPW2Lj scMWf49folZCdpy6dtkefTNwCbtyEtEhW8o0xWdnAxf/bYTk8As/ypl8tT+1lMK7o2 PEarmLu8eb/Y9ehowZ4NwiaM60hnIH34SbwfNERocPw+xF9a5QKDdZ8zCZuSeJPdQ4 zHfL1w/Hs98JXkRe4E4iWlzLgQHI2sAIUtqOPMIMFjbtaJuqXO8hZKqIuzujIGXDN2 Pepju1yE8xM7g== Original-Received: from alfajor (unknown [45.72.224.181]) by mail01.iro.umontreal.ca (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 9B063120304; Mon, 18 Jan 2021 11:32:47 -0500 (EST) In-Reply-To: <878s8qu5cv.fsf@Otto.invalid> (ASSI's message of "Mon, 18 Jan 2021 07:27:44 +0100") Received-SPF: pass client-ip=132.204.25.50; envelope-from=monnier@iro.umontreal.ca; helo=mailscanner.iro.umontreal.ca X-Spam_score_int: -42 X-Spam_score: -4.3 X-Spam_bar: ---- X-Spam_report: (-4.3 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:263152 Archived-At: > Let's put it this way: I haven't seen any major mode that does that so > far. I think the idea merits consideration, but as long as nobody tries > we don't really know what the pitfalls are. Someone has to be the first. Stefan