From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stefan Monnier Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Select completions from the minibuffer Date: Fri, 18 Mar 2022 08:08:13 -0400 Message-ID: References: <87v8wl35wg.fsf@gnus.org> <86k0d06dik.fsf@mail.linkov.net> <87ee3714li.fsf@gnus.org> <86r1773sb4.fsf@mail.linkov.net> <87pmmquew4.fsf@gnus.org> <86ee357wob.fsf@mail.linkov.net> <20220314090826.gyc42227jpvh4efa@Ergus> <86zglsiazs.fsf@mail.linkov.net> <20220317184701.ani7k3clp3impqwn@Ergus> <865yoc47d2.fsf@mail.linkov.net> <20220317231027.65clapwxz5qtnpm4@Ergus> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="35443"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/29.0.50 (gnu/linux) Cc: Juri Linkov , Lars Ingebrigtsen , emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Ergus Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Fri Mar 18 13:11:42 2022 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1nVBSG-000925-Eo for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Fri, 18 Mar 2022 13:11:40 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:47952 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1nVBSE-0003RV-JO for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Fri, 18 Mar 2022 08:11:39 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:59212) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1nVBP2-0001VN-9y for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 18 Mar 2022 08:08:20 -0400 Original-Received: from mailscanner.iro.umontreal.ca ([132.204.25.50]:26111) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1nVBOz-0005GJ-P0 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 18 Mar 2022 08:08:19 -0400 Original-Received: from pmg1.iro.umontreal.ca (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by pmg1.iro.umontreal.ca (Proxmox) with ESMTP id E28311003F8; Fri, 18 Mar 2022 08:08:15 -0400 (EDT) Original-Received: from mail01.iro.umontreal.ca (unknown [172.31.2.1]) by pmg1.iro.umontreal.ca (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 72BFB100306; Fri, 18 Mar 2022 08:08:14 -0400 (EDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=iro.umontreal.ca; s=mail; t=1647605294; bh=eIZGaP1Twk9Kf3+B/9Blig3RWPTHY91snv1mkFc5ksE=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:References:Date:In-Reply-To:From; b=Z5fjNCL7at/eh2kew6tA3OnAS+9JM9ijE98yV4lbHDqT1Uiw1yLmwa1/NHss1AODN Tg0/Ao/aPBkQbhbyJJduQB3IEKdn6u8vwGw0DQDF4AsYS9nYrEw45BmOQhpAPkqdTt QdbDl/tD9ei9+NQcSQdNmh65nWuRuAd4V4uzQBzE5alYopJXIFwFdD1I2Rinp/+Z84 dy8JAnlAGyLIUKH0hBkpNtzVdmvaqiBvS7iuvjpWthBQfq1MTpfqY0c75ZLu8V2dg9 sU0SrKHxUh248W9+yUZtIQjbvb1x0Tal8/W72ZhwMIM8PgQHKptlFgY4xsjZ3v0nci 1JS0nVVF31iwA== Original-Received: from pastel (unknown [45.72.221.51]) by mail01.iro.umontreal.ca (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 32E7E120297; Fri, 18 Mar 2022 08:08:14 -0400 (EDT) In-Reply-To: <20220317231027.65clapwxz5qtnpm4@Ergus> (Ergus's message of "Fri, 18 Mar 2022 00:10:27 +0100") Received-SPF: pass client-ip=132.204.25.50; envelope-from=monnier@iro.umontreal.ca; helo=mailscanner.iro.umontreal.ca X-Spam_score_int: -42 X-Spam_score: -4.3 X-Spam_bar: ---- X-Spam_report: (-4.3 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:287279 Archived-At: > Looking at the last line in `deactivate-mark` it seems like it is a > known issue and changing such optimization in the display engine may be Yuck! Maybe that code should use `force-mode-line-update` instead. Stefan