From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stefan Monnier Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Searching for line beginning Date: Wed, 17 Aug 2022 07:52:48 -0400 Message-ID: References: <831qtkm9ni.fsf@gnu.org> <878rnqq1qr.fsf@tcd.ie> <83pmh2kfaj.fsf@gnu.org> <8735dyhlud.fsf@gnus.org> <83o7wmkeqo.fsf@gnu.org> <87bksmf7vu.fsf@gnus.org> <83lerpiw2e.fsf@gnu.org> <87v8qt91pn.fsf@gnus.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="12963"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/29.0.50 (gnu/linux) Cc: Eli Zaretskii , contovob@tcd.ie, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Lars Ingebrigtsen Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Wed Aug 17 14:18:31 2022 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1oOI0E-0003Bm-DU for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Wed, 17 Aug 2022 14:18:30 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:51258 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1oOI0D-0002GL-25 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Wed, 17 Aug 2022 08:18:29 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:39172) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1oOHbX-0006lD-Hj for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 17 Aug 2022 07:52:59 -0400 Original-Received: from mailscanner.iro.umontreal.ca ([132.204.25.50]:30188) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1oOHbV-0002Qh-0e; Wed, 17 Aug 2022 07:52:58 -0400 Original-Received: from pmg3.iro.umontreal.ca (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pmg3.iro.umontreal.ca (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 4FFEE440CD1; Wed, 17 Aug 2022 07:52:55 -0400 (EDT) Original-Received: from mail01.iro.umontreal.ca (unknown [172.31.2.1]) by pmg3.iro.umontreal.ca (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 0F4B9440BAB; Wed, 17 Aug 2022 07:52:50 -0400 (EDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=iro.umontreal.ca; s=mail; t=1660737170; bh=GixbPBuRIwCtxmVnSQg5SscPrWN9OArDrEm6uBrrwiI=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:Date:From; b=KkAyThWj4CU6TfoSWzkAzmEpprJ78jHKEdTMjLiUnCn0it/HZDMwS1nnPS1hPY2TU Rxpz4krvZvKJ30fYlfgpRa1OD2AZl1ltHCeUjkl8p7wrslfXQ2hbvgv8MBxuekkhHp UBBaM1P4s2NcOyjzO7tuBR4aAvFETYJm4s2US0qjqpGQhmTpNDfr+js+ZYPONHl83L eeTEZoOy3r2KXvglpWQBI+42JawTcJG9cWAlU7DzqGQN+uydFaJhApGNV32CXcKcbL F6fuPcmo4gwqWWTYdUHwjFRXQbZCKmV1qYbo7kAWSEuE4uCFJTCiqVW8P+RYN07pm2 OILNbnBBzpazA== Original-Received: from pastel (unknown [45.72.195.111]) by mail01.iro.umontreal.ca (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id BF41F1202FF; Wed, 17 Aug 2022 07:52:49 -0400 (EDT) In-Reply-To: <87v8qt91pn.fsf@gnus.org> (Lars Ingebrigtsen's message of "Mon, 15 Aug 2022 13:37:56 +0200") Received-SPF: pass client-ip=132.204.25.50; envelope-from=monnier@iro.umontreal.ca; helo=mailscanner.iro.umontreal.ca X-Spam_score_int: -42 X-Spam_score: -4.3 X-Spam_bar: ---- X-Spam_report: (-4.3 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:293552 Archived-At: >> line-beginning-position is also needed in handling UI, so it needs to >> serve double duty. If the application doesn't need to cater to >> fields, it can disable that, see above. > If we want to fix this, I think we should just introduce two new > functions for "real" bol/eol, because this is already awkward enough. How 'bout adding an optional argument? Stefan