From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stefan Monnier Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel,gmane.emacs.pretest.bugs Subject: Re: carriage-return no longer works quite right in shell-mode Date: Tue, 04 Mar 2008 10:46:31 -0500 Message-ID: References: <87wsoow3zx.fsf@elegiac.orebokech.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1204645626 26844 80.91.229.12 (4 Mar 2008 15:47:06 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 4 Mar 2008 15:47:06 +0000 (UTC) Cc: christopher.ian.moore@gmail.com, emacs-pretest-bug@gnu.org, romain@orebokech.com, rms@gnu.org To: Kenichi Handa Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Mar 04 16:47:32 2008 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1JWZMR-0007pa-OP for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 04 Mar 2008 16:47:24 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1JWZLu-0007ze-N5 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 04 Mar 2008 10:46:50 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1JWZLq-0007zA-Nd for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 04 Mar 2008 10:46:46 -0500 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1JWZLn-0007yY-Tv for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 04 Mar 2008 10:46:46 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1JWZLn-0007yU-Pl for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 04 Mar 2008 10:46:43 -0500 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([140.186.70.10]) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1JWZLn-00031M-Cf for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 04 Mar 2008 10:46:43 -0500 Original-Received: from mail.gnu.org ([199.232.76.166] helo=mx10.gnu.org) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.67) (envelope-from ) id 1JWZLn-0004HM-4P for emacs-pretest-bug@gnu.org; Tue, 04 Mar 2008 10:46:43 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by monty-python.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1JWZLj-00030Z-VO for emacs-pretest-bug@gnu.org; Tue, 04 Mar 2008 10:46:43 -0500 Original-Received: from mercure.iro.umontreal.ca ([132.204.24.67]) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1JWZLj-00030P-O9; Tue, 04 Mar 2008 10:46:39 -0500 Original-Received: from hidalgo.iro.umontreal.ca (hidalgo.iro.umontreal.ca [132.204.27.50]) by mercure.iro.umontreal.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id D02F42CF771; Tue, 4 Mar 2008 10:46:38 -0500 (EST) Original-Received: from faina.iro.umontreal.ca (faina.iro.umontreal.ca [132.204.26.177]) by hidalgo.iro.umontreal.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id 23B1C3FE0; Tue, 4 Mar 2008 10:46:32 -0500 (EST) Original-Received: by faina.iro.umontreal.ca (Postfix, from userid 20848) id 0F5336C258; Tue, 4 Mar 2008 10:46:32 -0500 (EST) In-Reply-To: (Kenichi Handa's message of "Tue, 04 Mar 2008 20:42:32 +0900") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.0.60 (gnu/linux) X-DIRO-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the ISP for more information X-DIRO-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-DIRO-MailScanner-SpamCheck: n'est pas un polluriel, SpamAssassin (score=-2.82, requis 5, autolearn=not spam, ALL_TRUSTED -2.82) X-DIRO-MailScanner-From: monnier@iro.umontreal.ca X-detected-kernel: by monty-python.gnu.org: Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) X-detected-kernel: by monty-python.gnu.org: Linux 2.6, seldom 2.4 (older, 4) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:91290 gmane.emacs.pretest.bugs:21407 Archived-At: > I propose the following change to comint.el. Although I > think the new code improve the handling of CR, I have not > yet committed it because comint-output-filter (the caller of > comint-carriage-motion) does complicated marker and overlay > adjustment, and I'm not that confident that the new code > doesn't make the adjustment breaks. Could someone who is > familiar with comint-output-filter check it? Thanks for looking into it. I think you may as well commit it. Stefan