From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stefan Monnier Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Surely 'bzr branch' shouldn't be this slow? Date: Wed, 06 Jan 2010 09:37:12 -0500 Message-ID: References: <20100103174743.GB1653@muc.de> <87bphbhxxt.fsf@telefonica.net> <20100106131039.GB2447@muc.de> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1262788821 16280 80.91.229.12 (6 Jan 2010 14:40:21 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 6 Jan 2010 14:40:21 +0000 (UTC) Cc: =?iso-8859-1?Q?=D3scar?= Fuentes , emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Alan Mackenzie Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Jan 06 15:40:13 2010 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1NSX3V-0006qG-4D for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 06 Jan 2010 15:40:13 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:54411 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1NSX3U-0003oc-RX for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 06 Jan 2010 09:40:12 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1NSX0h-0000q3-3E for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 06 Jan 2010 09:37:19 -0500 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1NSX0c-0000mI-6R for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 06 Jan 2010 09:37:18 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=43256 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1NSX0c-0000mD-2Q for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 06 Jan 2010 09:37:14 -0500 Original-Received: from ironport2-out.teksavvy.com ([206.248.154.183]:23741 helo=ironport2-out.pppoe.ca) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1NSX0b-0007jr-Kh for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 06 Jan 2010 09:37:13 -0500 X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AtIFANouREvO+KPG/2dsb2JhbACBRdEGhDAEiig X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.49,229,1262581200"; d="scan'208";a="53144086" Original-Received: from 206-248-163-198.dsl.teksavvy.com (HELO ceviche.home) ([206.248.163.198]) by ironport2-out.pppoe.ca with ESMTP; 06 Jan 2010 09:37:12 -0500 Original-Received: by ceviche.home (Postfix, from userid 20848) id 7F771B4077; Wed, 6 Jan 2010 09:37:12 -0500 (EST) In-Reply-To: <20100106131039.GB2447@muc.de> (Alan Mackenzie's message of "Wed, 6 Jan 2010 13:10:39 +0000") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.1.91 (gnu/linux) X-detected-operating-system: by monty-python.gnu.org: Genre and OS details not recognized. X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:119525 Archived-At: > But it still feels a bit strange that creating a branch in the "wrong" > place takes up 39 minutes of processing. There's no question it's long. It's the same reason why the original checkout over the network is slow: a large part of the time is spent waiting for Bazaar to decide what to do next and where to put what, rather than waiting for the data to arrive from the remote end. Stefan