From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stefan Monnier Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: AUCTeX Mode Date: Thu, 26 Jan 2012 23:05:43 -0500 Message-ID: References: <87ipjx3l5e.fsf@uwakimon.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1327637156 11397 80.91.229.12 (27 Jan 2012 04:05:56 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 27 Jan 2012 04:05:56 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org, =?iso-8859-1?Q?J=FCrgen?= Fenn To: "Stephen J. Turnbull" Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Jan 27 05:05:52 2012 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([140.186.70.17]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Rqd4Q-0006Rb-Mx for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 27 Jan 2012 05:05:50 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:49993 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Rqd4P-0006Se-GA for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 26 Jan 2012 23:05:49 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:33980) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Rqd4N-0006SZ-2w for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 26 Jan 2012 23:05:47 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Rqd4M-0004T3-0H for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 26 Jan 2012 23:05:47 -0500 Original-Received: from ironport2-out.teksavvy.com ([206.248.154.183]:35378) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Rqd4L-0004Sz-Sc for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 26 Jan 2012 23:05:45 -0500 X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: Av0EAGkhIk9FpZaC/2dsb2JhbABCrlKBBoFyAQEEAVYjEAs0EhQYDSSID7gUiT4PAgQCBwIFAgIBBA8HCQECAQKEHgYFg10EiD+aeIRX X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.71,578,1320642000"; d="scan'208";a="159380287" Original-Received: from 69-165-150-130.dsl.teksavvy.com (HELO pastel.home) ([69.165.150.130]) by ironport2-out.teksavvy.com with ESMTP/TLS/ADH-AES256-SHA; 26 Jan 2012 23:05:44 -0500 Original-Received: by pastel.home (Postfix, from userid 20848) id B30E45923E; Thu, 26 Jan 2012 23:05:43 -0500 (EST) In-Reply-To: <87ipjx3l5e.fsf@uwakimon.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp> (Stephen J. Turnbull's message of "Fri, 27 Jan 2012 11:59:57 +0900") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.0.92 (gnu/linux) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Genre and OS details not recognized. X-Received-From: 206.248.154.183 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:147967 Archived-At: >> I just would like to ask why AUCTeX mode still isn't a part of Emacs? > Because it's not wholly-owned by the FSF, and despite heroic efforts > by one David Kastrup inter alia, AFAIK it's unlikely to achieve that > status any time soon. Actually, things have changed over time: nowadays it pretty much is, hence its place in ELPA. We could move it from ELPA to Emacs without any legal trouble. Stefan "Using `plain' latex-mode very happily, especially liking the C-c C-c command"