From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stefan Monnier Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Why "EMACS=24.4.91.2 (term:0.96)" in term-exec-1? Date: Mon, 30 Mar 2015 20:22:26 -0400 Message-ID: References: <874mp2oq8b.fsf@gmail.com> <837ftyzgw7.fsf@gnu.org> <87oanaecj0.fsf@gmail.com> <5519CD1E.7000404@cs.ucla.edu> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1427761363 5984 80.91.229.3 (31 Mar 2015 00:22:43 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 31 Mar 2015 00:22:43 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Eli Zaretskii , Oleh Krehel , emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Paul Eggert Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Mar 31 02:22:35 2015 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Ycjwx-0006gR-Cb for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 31 Mar 2015 02:22:35 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:36378 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Ycjww-0000Ks-NY for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 30 Mar 2015 20:22:34 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:47778) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Ycjwu-0000Kn-FV for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 30 Mar 2015 20:22:33 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Ycjwt-0001hj-O1 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 30 Mar 2015 20:22:32 -0400 Original-Received: from ironport2-out.teksavvy.com ([206.248.154.181]:29818) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Ycjwq-0001h5-63; Mon, 30 Mar 2015 20:22:28 -0400 X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AgUFAGvvdVRBbthL/2dsb2JhbAA3DoFFoW+BCIF1AQEEAVYjBQsLNBIUGA0kiBOiEYt7aQkBAgECgz4Dg3AEp2hT X-IPAS-Result: AgUFAGvvdVRBbthL/2dsb2JhbAA3DoFFoW+BCIF1AQEEAVYjBQsLNBIUGA0kiBOiEYt7aQkBAgECgz4Dg3AEp2hT X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.01,1,1400040000"; d="scan'208";a="115003003" Original-Received: from 65-110-216-75.cpe.pppoe.ca (HELO pastel.home) ([65.110.216.75]) by ironport2-out.teksavvy.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA; 30 Mar 2015 20:22:27 -0400 Original-Received: by pastel.home (Postfix, from userid 20848) id 4E471817; Mon, 30 Mar 2015 20:22:26 -0400 (EDT) In-Reply-To: <5519CD1E.7000404@cs.ucla.edu> (Paul Eggert's message of "Mon, 30 Mar 2015 15:24:30 -0700") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.0.50 (gnu/linux) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Genre and OS details not recognized. X-Received-From: 206.248.154.181 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:184580 Archived-At: > The latest version of Bash still looks at EMACS and not INSIDE_EMACS, so If we wait for them to move before we do, then nothing's ever going to move. Instead, we just have to wait until they *can* move. And nowadays they can move (because INSIDE_EMACS should be available in "all" the Emacsen that people are still using), so we can force the move. Stefan