From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Stefan Monnier Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: `thunk-let'? Date: Thu, 09 Nov 2017 13:48:43 -0500 Message-ID: References: <87infp9z6j.fsf@web.de> <87zi90eehg.fsf@web.de> <87o9ocd6s4.fsf@web.de> <87wp2zcwm2.fsf@web.de> <87mv3vwb2c.fsf_-_@web.de> NNTP-Posting-Host: blaine.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: blaine.gmane.org 1510253292 17967 195.159.176.226 (9 Nov 2017 18:48:12 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 9 Nov 2017 18:48:12 +0000 (UTC) User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.0.50 (gnu/linux) Cc: Nicolas Petton , Emacs Development To: Michael Heerdegen Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Nov 09 19:48:08 2017 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1eCrrz-0004TA-Ks for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 09 Nov 2017 19:48:07 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:38336 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1eCrs6-0001wP-PC for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 09 Nov 2017 13:48:14 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:39876) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1eCrrR-0001wJ-1p for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 09 Nov 2017 13:47:34 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1eCrrM-0006Sy-5q for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 09 Nov 2017 13:47:33 -0500 Original-Received: from chene.dit.umontreal.ca ([132.204.246.20]:60316) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1eCrrM-0006ST-1Z for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 09 Nov 2017 13:47:28 -0500 Original-Received: from lechazo.home (lechon.iro.umontreal.ca [132.204.27.242]) by chene.dit.umontreal.ca (8.14.7/8.14.1) with ESMTP id vA9IlPxg014344; Thu, 9 Nov 2017 13:47:25 -0500 Original-Received: by lechazo.home (Postfix, from userid 20848) id 5F81360F12; Thu, 9 Nov 2017 13:48:43 -0500 (EST) In-Reply-To: <87mv3vwb2c.fsf_-_@web.de> (Michael Heerdegen's message of "Thu, 09 Nov 2017 19:39:55 +0100") X-NAI-Spam-Flag: NO X-NAI-Spam-Threshold: 5 X-NAI-Spam-Score: 0 X-NAI-Spam-Rules: 2 Rules triggered EDT_SA_DN_PASS=0, RV6155=0 X-NAI-Spam-Version: 2.3.0.9418 : core <6155> : inlines <6167> : streams <1769814> : uri <2531056> X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Genre and OS details not recognized. X-Received-From: 132.204.246.20 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:220005 Archived-At: >> > Maybe a better option is to add a `require` in the expansion of >> > lazy-let? > But then we need to wrap it in `eval-and-compile' because we want to > expand the (macro) `thunk-delay' that appears in the expansion at > compile time. Yeah, pretty ugly. Now I see why my intuition told me that lazy-let should be in thunk.el ;-) Stefan