From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Stefan Monnier Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: mouse-drag-and-drop-region Date: Fri, 24 Nov 2017 08:25:39 -0500 Message-ID: References: <5A0ABD41.5040402@gmx.at> <20171116.092825.1408561780440493246.tak.kunihiro@gmail.com> <5A0D562D.1010803@gmx.at> <20171120.222937.949251858246319152.tak.kunihiro@gmail.com> <5A13F0CA.2030605@gmx.at> <5A1432B0.8080700@gmx.at> <5A1534B4.6030203@gmx.at> <5A167CEC.5070400@gmx.at> <838texaser.fsf@gnu.org> <5A17E010.4090309@gmx.at> <83k1yg9gpz.fsf@gnu.org> <5A17E938.2020308@gmx.at> NNTP-Posting-Host: blaine.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: blaine.gmane.org 1511529993 26210 195.159.176.226 (24 Nov 2017 13:26:33 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 24 Nov 2017 13:26:33 +0000 (UTC) User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.0.50 (gnu/linux) To: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Nov 24 14:26:30 2017 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1eIDzx-0006R7-8J for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 24 Nov 2017 14:26:29 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:49255 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1eIE03-0007RI-3z for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 24 Nov 2017 08:26:35 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:43472) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1eIDzP-0007R1-Mz for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 24 Nov 2017 08:25:56 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1eIDzL-0007Vd-Lj for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 24 Nov 2017 08:25:55 -0500 Original-Received: from [195.159.176.226] (port=49159 helo=blaine.gmane.org) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1eIDzL-0007VT-E9 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 24 Nov 2017 08:25:51 -0500 Original-Received: from list by blaine.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1eIDz7-0003J5-Uw for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 24 Nov 2017 14:25:37 +0100 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ Original-Lines: 10 Original-X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org Cancel-Lock: sha1:Mo1Tr3qZ5ddpL8Ntj2f5kjb/NYQ= X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] [fuzzy] X-Received-From: 195.159.176.226 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:220428 Archived-At: > Yes. I already said that I don't fully understand the arguments against > `read-event'. There's no problem with read-event itself. The problems is that you can't reliably *un*read an event, so the arguments are against uses of read-event that just "peek" at the next event without the intention to fully consume it. Stefan