From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stefan Monnier Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: new-flex-completion-style Date: Tue, 19 Feb 2019 08:32:08 -0500 Message-ID: References: <20190202232827.27331.87300@vcs0.savannah.gnu.org> <20190202232828.4AE452159A@vcs0.savannah.gnu.org> <87lg2mynrg.fsf@gmail.com> <87wolwvn8k.fsf@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: blaine.gmane.org; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:195.159.176.226"; logging-data="214673"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@blaine.gmane.org" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.0.50 (gnu/linux) Cc: emacs-devel To: =?windows-1252?B?Sm/jbyBU4XZvcmE=?= Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Feb 19 14:33:02 2019 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1gw5W9-000tdf-Tm for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 19 Feb 2019 14:33:02 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:48840 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gw5W8-0000Cw-NR for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 19 Feb 2019 08:33:00 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:34206) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gw5VO-0000Ca-0X for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 19 Feb 2019 08:32:14 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gw5VN-0006DD-5R for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 19 Feb 2019 08:32:13 -0500 Original-Received: from chene.dit.umontreal.ca ([132.204.246.20]:40465) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gw5VL-0006BI-Af for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 19 Feb 2019 08:32:13 -0500 Original-Received: from ceviche.home (lechon.iro.umontreal.ca [132.204.27.242]) by chene.dit.umontreal.ca (8.14.7/8.14.1) with ESMTP id x1JDW8ki024948; Tue, 19 Feb 2019 08:32:09 -0500 Original-Received: by ceviche.home (Postfix, from userid 20848) id BFCB166191; Tue, 19 Feb 2019 08:32:08 -0500 (EST) In-Reply-To: (=?windows-1252?Q?=22Jo=E3o_T=E1vora=22's?= message of "Tue, 19 Feb 2019 13:01:09 +0000") X-NAI-Spam-Flag: NO X-NAI-Spam-Threshold: 5 X-NAI-Spam-Score: 0.1 X-NAI-Spam-Rules: 3 Rules triggered GEN_SPAM_FEATRE=0.1, EDT_SA_DN_PASS=0, RV6486=0 X-NAI-Spam-Version: 2.3.0.9418 : core <6486> : inlines <7018> : streams <1813492> : uri <2798829> X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Genre and OS details not recognized. X-Received-From: 132.204.246.20 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:233454 Archived-At: > Because of my other change to that function, it now also > prevails over minibuffer-default. This is why I didn't specifically > mention minibuffer-history-variable. That and writing commit > messages is hard. The upside is that nitpicking is easy, Stefan