From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stefan Monnier Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Tab bar tabs landed on master Date: Sun, 06 Oct 2019 18:53:44 -0400 Message-ID: References: <8736gci5jn.fsf@mail.linkov.net> <87zhikp0ba.fsf@mail.linkov.net> <87lfu4jbbu.fsf@Ergus.i-did-not-set--mail-host-address--so-tickle-me> <87tv8myi8m.fsf@mail.linkov.net> <83imp13ihn.fsf@gnu.org> <87wodhn21l.fsf@mail.linkov.net> <83ftk51ydt.fsf@gnu.org> <87imp1k79d.fsf@mail.linkov.net> <838spx1x74.fsf@gnu.org> <87imp1ef9i.fsf@mail.linkov.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: blaine.gmane.org; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:195.159.176.226"; logging-data="198802"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@blaine.gmane.org" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.0.50 (gnu/linux) Cc: lekktu@gmail.com, Eli Zaretskii , spacibba@aol.com, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Juri Linkov Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Oct 07 00:54:03 2019 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1iHFPd-000pZK-R1 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 07 Oct 2019 00:54:02 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:37354 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1iHFPc-000878-Lq for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 06 Oct 2019 18:54:00 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:48035) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1iHFPW-00085o-Ax for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 06 Oct 2019 18:53:55 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1iHFPT-00045N-IC for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 06 Oct 2019 18:53:52 -0400 Original-Received: from mailscanner.iro.umontreal.ca ([132.204.25.50]:8450) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1iHFPS-00044l-0X; Sun, 06 Oct 2019 18:53:50 -0400 Original-Received: from pmg1.iro.umontreal.ca (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by pmg1.iro.umontreal.ca (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 5FC5F1009C1; Sun, 6 Oct 2019 18:53:48 -0400 (EDT) Original-Received: from mail01.iro.umontreal.ca (unknown [172.31.2.1]) by pmg1.iro.umontreal.ca (Proxmox) with ESMTP id EE1521006CE; Sun, 6 Oct 2019 18:53:46 -0400 (EDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=iro.umontreal.ca; s=mail; t=1570402427; bh=ckOcUGCdLaiGs3pbloaffuDtBjdVu/WzyLIedoeO1kE=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:References:Date:In-Reply-To:From; b=VtEfn2k8WTc7eIZt+gQbqVfYVeaZPUhfFSwOOjSTmlcb6ccbbRTWr99OCwL4LRqng wPsMzo3Rt8h1PTWRo8heM+Qk4Xr4YRqvb4vQsm6g95xak/cUofDxNn4W7MmPQpPOi5 jjA8Kd4kjbcNinfuXRolvvwygGuIQ0GNdH2ZJlSigyBiXfSseisUYj7p4Uko8lrYAi Y4tyl27ZpuCQKqe8470rFNBn1TEZHbBykpqXYubfznZ6OPF2LMthu0avLngLrWfOjL pVCHUPJkYQjgx7ZtMA+/Laymk3HOrcKeSm1g0uMJ6CE+2Ak5/tu1i3irsJhEbfkw9h tUt9UMJ5cIc9Q== Original-Received: from alfajor (76-10-181-40.dsl.teksavvy.com [76.10.181.40]) by mail01.iro.umontreal.ca (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 54D4F120775; Sun, 6 Oct 2019 18:53:46 -0400 (EDT) In-Reply-To: <87imp1ef9i.fsf@mail.linkov.net> (Juri Linkov's message of "Mon, 07 Oct 2019 00:27:21 +0300") X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] [fuzzy] X-Received-From: 132.204.25.50 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:240681 Archived-At: > I could help the author of `other-frame-window` to extend it > with tabs. It uses these prefixes: > > C-x 7 - other-window > C-x 9 - other-frame I use it with prefix C-x 4 and C-x 5 > But I don't know what prefix to propose for other-tab. > There are no more digits available on the C-x prefix. The choice of a useful yet "safe" default is not obvious, indeed. But users can decide to use C-x 3, C-x 6, C-x 5 or whatever they fee like. Stefan